Purpose:To evaluate ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) findings in the viable twisted adnexa. Materials and Methods:Ten patients underwent US and MR studies before surgical detorsion. Corrected cross-sectional area of the ovary was defined as cross-sectional area minus areas of cysts and follicles superior to 1 cm. On T2-weighted images, signal intensity of the stroma was graded as type 1 when it was equal to that of urine and type 2 when it was less than that of urine but markedly more than the contralateral side. Results:The tube was twisted in six cases and the ovary in nine cases. All adnexa were viable. The largest ovarian cross-sectional area and the largest corrected ovarian cross-sectional area of the twisted ovary were significantly larger than those of the contralateral ovary (P ϭ 0.043 for US; P ϭ 0.012 and 0.017, respectively, for MR). These ovaries contained types 1 and 2 hyperintensity in six cases and only type 2 hyperintensity in three cases. Tubal thickening was seen on MR in five cases. Conclusion:Tubal thickening, enlargement of ovarian stroma as reflected by the corrected cross-sectional area, and hyperintensity of this stroma on T2-weighted images probably related to edema were useful findings in these viable torsions.

Objective: To evaluate the cesarean section rate using the Robson Classification for the first time in Lebanon, at Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Beirut.Methods: Routine medical record data that included all live births from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2020 was investigated. The overall cesarean section rate was recorded, and the size, cesarean section rate, and absolute and relative contributions were calculated within each group. Results:The overall cesarean section rate was 56.8%. The highest relative contribution to this rate came from Robson groups 5, 2 and 10, respectively. A decrease in cesarean section rate was noted in 2020 among women admitted for induction of labor (groups 2 and 4) following the implementation of new department policies and the restrictions caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Conclusion:More than 50% of the deliveries in our department were by cesarean sections (CS). Strategies to reduce this rate should include stricter departmental policies for avoidance of unindicated primary CS and raising practitioners' and patients' awareness about trial of labor after cesarean section.

Objective: The study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of 200 and 400 µg of oral misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy. Methods: A double-blinded randomized study included 70 patients scheduled for hysteroscopy in a Lebanese University Hospital. Two dosages of oral misoprostol (200 or 400 µg) were randomly distributed to these patients 1 h before surgery under general anesthesia. Subjective assessment of the ease of dilatation, size of the first used Hegar, cervical injuries, bleeding or uterine perforation, duration of the procedure and misoprostol adverse effect were all noted and compared. Results: The difficulty of dilation until a Hegar 10 was similar for both treatment groups. Operative time was not reduced with a higher misoprostol dosage. We found 2 uterine perforations within the 200 µg group (6.7%), and none within the 400 µg group. Cervical lacerations and bleeding were similar (20%) for both treatment groups. A 2-fold increase in side effects (nausea, vomiting and cramps) is reported among the 400 µg group. Conclusions: Increasing the dose of misoprostol from 200 to 400 mg doubled the rate of side effects while no clinical benefit was noted. Larger trials are needed to assess rates of uterine perforation with the 200 µg dosage.

BackgroundWe analyzed the patients’ perception of prenatal diagnosis of fetal cardiac pathology, and the reasons for choosing to continue with pregnancy despite being eligible to receive a medical termination of pregnancy. We also identified the challenges, the motives interfering in decision-making, and the consequences of the decisions on pregnancy, child and mother.MethodsThis descriptive, prospective and longitudinal study was conducted in France, amongst pregnant women who wished to continue their pregnancy despite an unfavorable medical advice (incurable fetal cardiac pathologies). Socio-demographic data were collected through a questionnaire. Such questionnaire covered information assessing the parents/mother’s perception of prenatal diagnosis, and medical termination of pregnancy, their interpretation of the established diagnosis and their motives for not considering pregnancy termination.Results72 eligible patients were analyzed over one year: mean age 33 ± 6.89 years, 47 patients had already given birth to ≥1 healthy child. Mean gestational age at the detection of fetal cardiac pathologies was 30 ± 4.37 weeks of amenorrhea. Patients decided to keep the child after 3 ± 1.25 consultations. 56 (77.78%) patients made their decision with their husbands and 16 made their decision alone. Reasons for declining the medical termination were culpability and responsibility (n = 36), ideologies and convictions (n = 24), mistrust and hope (n = 12). Newborns of 67 patients died with a mean survival duration of 38 days.ConclusionsPatient informed consent should be sought before any decision in neonatology, even if conflicting with the medical team’s knowledge and the pregnant mother’s benefits. Decisions to accept or decline pregnancy termination depend on the patients’ psychological character, ideologies, convictions, and mistrust in the diagnosis/prognosis, or hope in the fetus survival.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0270-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.