Diabetes medications may modify the risk of certain cancers. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2011 to March 2021 for studies evaluating associations between diabetes medications and the risk of breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, liver, and pancreatic cancers. A total of 92 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 64 cohort studies, and 25 case–control studies) were identified in the systematic review, involving 171 million participants. Inverse relationships with colorectal (n = 18; RR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.78–0.92) and liver cancers (n = 10; RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.46–0.66) were observed in biguanide users. Thiazolidinediones were associated with lower risks of breast (n = 6; RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.80–0.95), lung (n = 6; RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.61–0.96) and liver (n = 8; RR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72–0.95) cancers. Insulins were negatively associated with breast (n = 15; RR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82–0.98) and prostate cancer risks (n = 7; RR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.56–0.98). Positive associations were found between insulin secretagogues and pancreatic cancer (n = 5; RR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.01–1.57), and between insulins and liver (n = 7; RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.08–2.80) and pancreatic cancers (n = 8; RR = 2.41; 95% CI = 1.08–5.36). Overall, biguanide and thiazolidinedione use carried no risk, or potentially lower risk of some cancers, while insulin secretagogue and insulin use were associated with increased pancreatic cancer risk.
Diabetes medications may modify the risk of certain cancers. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2011 to March 2021 for studies evaluating associations between diabetes medications and the risk of breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, liver, and pancreatic cancers. A total of 92 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 64 cohort, and 25 case-control studies) were identified, involving 171 million participants. Inverse relationships with colorectal (RR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.78–0.92) and liver cancers (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.46–0.66) were observed in biguanide users. Thiazolidinediones were associated with lower risks of breast (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.80–0.95), lung (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.61–0.96) and liver (RR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.72–0.95) cancers. Insulins were negatively associated with breast (RR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82–0.98) and prostate cancer risks (RR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.56–0.98). Positive associations were found between insulin secretagogues and pancreatic cancer (RR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.01–1.57), and between insulins and liver (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.08–2.80) and pancreatic cancers (RR = 2.41; 95% CI = 1.08–5.36). Overall, biguanide and thiazolidinedione use carried no risk, or potentially lower risk of some cancers, while insulin secretagogue and insulin use were associated with increased pancreatic cancer risk.
Background: Cancer is a growing public health challenge. Innovative approaches to prevent the future burden of cancer are needed. Diabetes medications may help to decrease the risk of cancers, however, a better understanding of relationships by cancer site and diabetes medication class are essential to guide future clinical trials. However, there is not adequate knowledge synthesis on different types of diabetes medications and cancer types. We aim to provide an integrated view of diabetes medications’ role and site-specific cancers.Methods: This systematic review will include observational studies (cohort, nested case-control, case-cohort, and case-control) and randomized controlled trials in human adults in which the effect of diabetes medication use on breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, liver, and pancreatic cancers was evaluated. The former four are among the most common cancer types, while liver and pancreatic cancer are of interest due to the biological roles of the liver and pancreas in blood glucose regulation. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane CENTRAL will be searched using a comprehensive and sensitive search strategy. The reference list of identified studies and relevant systematic reviews will be manually screened. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data, and assess quality. Random-effect models will be employed to obtain overall pooled estimates of associations and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This systematic review and meta-analyses will be reported following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Results will be reported as specified by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.Discussion: Findings of this review will help to clarify relationships between diabetes medication and cancer, which is critical for future efforts to improve cancer prevention. Further, challenges and limitations identified in this review will foster opportunities to refine design and analysis procedures in future studies. Systematic review registration: The systematic review protocol was registered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/frg5z) and on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021239348).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.