No abstract

Sustainable energy production is a worldwide concern due to the adverse effects and limited availability of fossil fuels, requiring the development of suitable environmentally friendly alternatives. Hydrogen is considered a sustainable future energy source owing to its unique properties as a clean and nontoxic fuel with high energy yield and abundance. Hydrogen can be produced through renewable and nonrenewable sources where the production method and feedstock used are indicators of whether they are carbon-neutral or not. Biomass is one of the renewable hydrogen sources that is also available in large quantities and can be used in different conversion methods to produce fuel, heat, chemicals, etc. Biomass gasification is a promising technology to generate carbon-neutral hydrogen. However, tar production during this process is the biggest obstacle limiting hydrogen production and commercialization of biomass gasification technology. This review focuses on hydrogen production through catalytic biomass gasification. The effect of different catalysts to enhance hydrogen production is reviewed, and social, technological, economic, environmental, and political (STEEP) analysis of catalysts is carried out to demonstrate challenges in the field and the development of catalysts.

No abstract

Carbon derived from various biomass sources has been evaluated as support material for thermal energy storage systems. However, process optimization of Miscanthus-derived carbon to be used for encapsulating phase change materials has not been reported to date. In this study, process optimization to evaluate the effects of selected operation parameters of pyrolysis time, temperature, and biomass:catalyst mass ratio on the surface area and pore volume of produced carbon is conducted using response surface methodology. In the process, ZnCl2 is used as a catalyst to promote high pore volume and area formation. Two sets of optimum conditions with different pyrolysis operation parameters in order to produce carbons with the highest pore area and volume are determined as 614 °C, 53 min, and 1:2 biomass to catalyst ratio and 722 °C, 77 min, and 1:4 biomass to catalyst ratio with 1415.4 m2/g and 0.748 cm3/g and 1499.8 m2/g and 1.443 cm3/g total pore volume, respectively. Carbon material produced at 614 °C exhibits mostly micro- and mesosized pores, while carbon obtained at 722 °C comprises mostly of meso- and macroporous structures. Findings of this study demonstrate the significance of process optimization for designing porous carbon material to be used in thermal and electrochemical energy storage systems.