The corrected porosity image analysis and log data can be used to build 3D models for porosity and permeability. This can be much realistic porosity obtainable because the core test data is not always available due to high cost which is a challenge for petroleum companies and petrophysists. Thus, this method can be used as an advantage of thin section studies and for opening horizon for more studies in the future to obtain reservoir properties. Seventy-two core samples were selected and the same numbers of thin sections were made from Khasib, Sa`di, and Hartha, formations from Ba-1, Ba-4, and Ba-8 wells, Balad Oilfield in Central Iraq to make a comprehensive view of using porosity image analysis software to determine the porosity. The petrophysical description including porosity image analysis was utilized and both laboratory core test analysis and well log analysis were used to correct and calibrate the results. The main reservoir properties including porosity and permeability were measured based on core samples laboratory analysis. The results of porosity obtained from well log analysis and porosity image analysis method are corrected by using SPSS software; the results revealed good correlation coefficients between 0.684 and 0.872. The porosity range values are 9-16% and 9-27% for Khasib and Sa’di in Ba-1 Well, respectively; 10-21%, 9-25%, and 16-27% for Khasib, Sa’di and Hartha in Ba-4 Well, respectively; and 11-24% and 15-24% for Khasib and Hartha in Ba-8 Well, respectively according to petrographic image analysis. By using the laboratory core analysis, the porosity range values are 12-26% and 17-24% for Khasib and Sa’di in Ba-1 Well, respectively; 6-28% and 14-27% for Sa’di and Hartha in Ba-4 Well, respectively; and 17-19% and 15-24% for Sa’di and Hartha in Ba-8 Well, respectively. Finally, the well log analysis showed that the porosity range values are 11-16% and 7-27% for Khasib and Sa’di in Ba-1 Well, respectively; 4-18%, 21-26%, and 16-19% for Khasib, Sa’di and Hartha in Ba-4 Well, respectively; and 9-24% and 15-23% for Khasib and Hartha in Ba-8 Well, respectively. The permeability range values based on laboratory core analysis are 1.51-8.97 md and 0.29-2.77 md for Khasib and Sa’di in Ba-1 Well, respectively; 0.01-24.5 md and 0.28-6.47 md for Sa’di and Hartha in Ba-4 Well, respectively; and 0.86-2.25 md and 0.23-3.66 for Sa’di and Hartha in Ba-8 Well, respectively.

The optimum drilling of oil and gas wells are achieved by reduce costs and time, which will be accomplished with an optimal hydraulic cleaning program. Drilling fluid characteristics, drilling parameters, and well geometrics are regarded as major categories for achieving an optimal hydraulic program based on depth, penetration rate, and flow rate. This study was used a set of equations that related directly and indirectly to estimate the optimal cleaning efficiency in annulus. The procedure is applied here using actual data from an Iraqi oil field to determine the limitation of all parameters that affect the lifting capacity. Cutting transform was regarded as a major element of the well cleaning program as a result of constraints such as avoiding high surge pressure during lifting pipes, high swab pressure when downloading pipes, and fluid loss during rotation. An increase in annular space indicates a decrease in the capacity of drilling fluid to lift cuttings to the surface and an increase in dynamic shear stress. Also, an increase in cutting size, which has a direct relationship with penetration rate that can be effect for cleaning efficacy in annulus.