Among patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation, prasugrel did not significantly reduce the frequency of the primary end point, as compared with clopidogrel, and similar risks of bleeding were observed. (Funded by Eli Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo; TRILOGY ACS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699998.).

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation is associated with higher mortality. Identification of causes of death and contemporary risk factors for all‐cause mortality may guide interventions.Methods and ResultsIn the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study, patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to rivaroxaban or dose‐adjusted warfarin. Cox proportional hazards regression with backward elimination identified factors at randomization that were independently associated with all‐cause mortality in the 14 171 participants in the intention‐to‐treat population. The median age was 73 years, and the mean CHADS 2 score was 3.5. Over 1.9 years of median follow‐up, 1214 (8.6%) patients died. Kaplan–Meier mortality rates were 4.2% at 1 year and 8.9% at 2 years. The majority of classified deaths (1081) were cardiovascular (72%), whereas only 6% were nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. No significant difference in all‐cause mortality was observed between the rivaroxaban and warfarin arms (P=0.15). Heart failure (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.33–1.70, P<0.0001) and age ≥75 years (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.51–1.90, P<0.0001) were associated with higher all‐cause mortality. Multiple additional characteristics were independently associated with higher mortality, with decreasing creatinine clearance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, male sex, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes being among the most strongly associated (model C‐index 0.677).ConclusionsIn a large population of patients anticoagulated for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, ≈7 in 10 deaths were cardiovascular, whereas <1 in 10 deaths were caused by nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. Optimal prevention and treatment of heart failure, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes may improve survival.Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Mortality rates from acute myocardial infarctions have been declining in the past 4 decades since percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) became a valid therapeutical option. PCI is a non-surgical revascularization procedure in which blood flow in an occluded or narrowed epicardial coronary artery is re-established by inflating an angioplasty balloon in order to remove the blockage, followed by the insertion of a stent in order to maintain the patency of the artery. Since the late ‘70s when the first bare metal stents (BMS) became available, progress has been made in developing new types of stents in order to lower the incidence of two important and feared complications: and thrombosis restenosis.While thrombosis is manageable and preventable with antithrombotic therapy, restenosis is a more complex issue of which many clinicians may not be aware or underestimate. The review would like to summarize the current knowledge from the literature on stent restenosis and present to clinicians some tools for recognizing, or at least suspecting, restenosis in their patients.

No abstract

Background and aim. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most important causes of death worldwide. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is an acute form of presentation in patients with CAD. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice in STEMI patients. Generally, a stent is placed after the culprit lesion is dilated in order to ensure the patency of the coronary artery. In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a possible chronic complication in this setting. The following study is one of the few of its kind, since it investigates ISR in a cohort of Romanian patients who underwent PCI in the setting of STEMI. Our current descriptive study aims at highlighting the characteristics of these patients and identifying potential risk factors in this specific population, which could be validated by a further larger study. Methods. We studied 68 patients from “Dr. Carol Davila” Central Military Emergency University Hospital in Bucharest, Romania, who presented with STEMI in 2016. The mean time for angiographic reevaluation was 111 days. Results. 94% (64) of the patients underwent primary PCI, while in 6% (4) of the cases thrombolysis was initially attempted before PCI. The most prevalent risk factors that we identified were: arterial hypertension (61%), dyslipidemia (60%) and smoking or history of smoking (47%). The anterior myocardial infarction was the most prevalent (49%). Only 6% of the patients had a documented history of CAD, while on the other hand chronic occlusions were observed in most patients (85%). Of note is that only 11% of the patients reported recurrent angina before the angiographic reevaluation. Conclusion. Common cardiovascular risk factors are also involved in ISR. Their poor management in the case of Romanian patients with STEMI increases the risk of ISR. The lack of symptoms in patients with ISR constitutes a warning sign for clinicians and shows that ISR is a complication which can be easily omitted. Therefore, its incidence is probably underestimated.