Objectives: To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. Design: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. Setting: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. Patients: Not applicable. Interventions: Not applicable. Measurements and Main Results: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. Conclusions: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality.

Cardiogenic flash pulmonary oedema is a common and potentially fatal cause of acute respiratory distress. Although it often results from acute decompensated heart failure, abrupt-onset aortic regurgitation can sharply rise cardiac filling pressure and, consequently, pulmonary venous pressure, leading to rapid fluid accumulation in the interstitial and alveolar spaces. We report a case of a 64-year-old woman admitted to the emergency department with a flash pulmonary oedema; a careful clinical investigation subsequently revealed a rare aetiology for this 'common' presentation. After a detailed auscultation that unmasked a diastolic cardiac murmur, an acute severe aortic insufficiency was further confirmed by echocardiography, showing inflammation and thickening of the entire aorta wall. The patient was submitted to valve replacement surgery, and histological examination, to our surprise, showed features of aortitis, remarkable for the presence of giant cells. A diagnosis of idiopathic aortitis versus inaugural giant cell arteritis was proposed and treatment started with corticosteroids.

A 42-year-old black woman presented with fever, polyarthritis, livedo reticularis, subcutaneous calf nodules and hepatomegaly. She had been diagnosed with depression 6 weeks prior. Blood analysis showed anaemia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein, elevated liver enzymes, and positive antinuclear and antiribonucleoprotein antibodies. Abdominal ultrasound revealed heterogeneous hepatomegaly with necrotic lymphadenopathy around the caeliac trunk and splenic hilum. We considered the following diagnoses: lymphoma, connective tissue disease, tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. Subcutaneous nodule histology was compatible with erythema induratum of Bazin, and liver biopsy evidenced granulomatous hepatitis. Although microbiological examinations were negative in tissue samples, a presumptive diagnosis of hepatic tuberculosis was admitted. Having excluded other causes, erythema of Bazin, livedo reticularis and polyarticular involvement (Ponçet's arthropathy) were accepted as immunological epiphenomena associated with tuberculosis. Empirical antituberculous treatment was started and after 3 weeks the patient improved substantially. This clinical response was a further confirmation of the diagnosis.