Ovarian cancer has become the largest cause of gynaecological cancer-related mortality. It is typically diagnosed at a late stage and has no effective screening strategy. Ovarian cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease that can be subdivided into several molecular subsets. As a result of a greater understanding of molecular pathways involved in carcinogenesis and tumor growth, targeted agents have been approved or are in several stages of development. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A antibodies are two types of approved and most effective targeted drugs for ovarian cancer at present. With the success of bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors which could target alternate angiogenic pathways are being studied. Furthermore, many treatments targeting the PI3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways, are being developed or are already in clinical studies. MicroRNAs have also become novel biomarkers for the therapy and clinical diagnosis of ovarian cancer. This manuscript reviews the molecular, preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the targeting of growth-dependent pathways in ovarian cancer and assesses current data related to targeted treatments beyond PARP inhibitors.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) encloses a group of heterogeneous tumours, the primary sites for which cannot be identified at the time of diagnosis, despite extensive investigations. CUP has always posed major challenges both in its diagnosis and management, leading to the hypothesis that it is rather a distinct entity with specific genetic and phenotypic aberrations, considering the regression or dormancy of the primary tumour; the development of early, uncommon systemic metastases; and the resistance to therapy. Patients with CUP account for 1–3% of all human malignancies and can be categorised into two prognostic subsets according to their clinicopathologic characteristics at presentation. The diagnosis of CUP mainly depends on the standard evaluation comprising a thorough medical history; complete physical examination; histopathologic morphology and algorithmic immunohistochemistry assessment; and CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. However, physicians and patients do not fare well with these criteria and often perform additional time-consuming evaluations to identify the primary tumour site to guide treatment decisions. The development of molecularly guided diagnostic strategies has emerged to complement traditional procedures but has been disappointing thus far. In this review, we present the latest data on CUP regarding the biology, molecular profiling, classification, diagnostic workup, and treatment.