OBJECTIVE -To assess changes in diabetic lower-extremity amputation rates in a defined relatively static population over an 11-year period following the introduction of a multidisciplinary foot team.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -All diabetic patients with foot problems admitted to Ipswich Hospital, a large district general hospital, were identified by twice-weekly surveillance of all relevant in-patient areas and outcomes including amputations recorded.RESULTS -The incidence of major amputations fell 62%, from 7.4 to 2.8 per 100,000 of the general population. Total amputation rates also decreased (40.3%) but to a lesser extent due to a small increase in minor amputations. Expressed as incidence per 10,000 people with diabetes, total amputations fell 70%, from 53.2 to 16.0, and major amputations fell 82%, from 36.4 to 6.7.CONCLUSIONS -Significant reductions in total and major amputation rates occurred over the 11-year period following improvements in foot care services including multidisciplinary team work. Diabetes Care 31:99-101, 2008A mputation is one of the most feared diabetes complications. The economic burden is immense, and survival is bleak, with a 2-year mortality up to 50% (1-6). There is an urgent need to reduce amputation rates, which vary considerably globally and nationally (7-13). Though often attributed to differences in ethnicity and local practice, such variability could be due to other factors. These include differences in defining minor versus major amputations and in assessing the denominator, i.e., 1) the size of the general population (often ill defined, particularly in cities because of overlap with other institutions) and 2) the diabetic population (sometimes simply estimated from the expected prevalence) (14). Finally, of considerable importance is the accuracy of ascertainment. Nearly all studies have been retrospective, collected from a variety of sources including theater and limb-fitting records, anesthetic databases, and hospital activity coding. In 2004, we demo n s t r a t e d t h a t c o m p a r e d w i t h prospective data collection, such methods underestimated the incidence by 4.2-90.6% and misclassified 4.5-17.4% of amputations (15). Others have reported similar inaccuracies (16,17). We therefore recommended that future studies should be prospective.This study of the impact of improvements in foot care on lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) addresses these problems; it is prospective, amputation levels are made clear, and the population is well defined.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -The survey was conducted between 1995 and 2005 in a defined, predominantly Caucasian (95%), mixed rural/urban population served by Ipswich Hospital from which there are few cross-boundary referrals. Over the period, the population grew from 330,462 to 345,890. In contrast, the diabetic population rose dramatically from 6,768 to 11,906. The largest increase followed introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in 2005, whereby practitioners are paid to achieve diabetes targets (18).An LEA was de...
This article demonstrates that Gramsci's concept of passive revolution can be utilised to help unearth some of the contradictions of participatory development within neoliberal governance systems in the global South. I argue that some approaches to “participation” within neoliberal governance systems can, in part, be understood as moments within a protracted process of passive revolution. The argument is traced through eThekwini municipality's Community Participation Programme and the related extension of Free Basic Water (FBW). This article contributes to existing scholarship by demonstrating how a Gramscian analysis is indispensable to understanding the way in which state–civil society relations are conceived in participatory development strategies and the implications this might have for radical social change. I argue that a Gramscian approach compels us to reconsider current understandings of state–civil society relations so that we might overcome the impasse of passive revolution and move towards a more progressive form of politics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.