The response of proteins to different forms of stress continues to be a topic of major interest, especially with the proliferation of electromagnetic devices conjectured to have detrimental effects on human health. In this paper, we have performed molecular dynamics simulations on insulin chain-B under the influence of both static and oscillating electric fields, ranging from 10(7) to 10(9) V/m. We have found that both variants have an effect on the normal behavior of the protein, with oscillating fields being more disruptive to the structure as compared to static fields of similar effective strength. The application of a static field had a stabilizing effect on the secondary structure, restricting the inherent flexibility that is crucial for insulin's biological activity.
The physicochemical properties of a set of molecules containing Cu, Ag, or Au atoms were calculated using the GAUSSIAN program suite, with the purpose of investigating the various density functional theory (DFT) approaches for subsequent application in cluster calculations. The test set comprised the copper-based molecules CuH, CuO, CuS, Cu2, CuCl2 -, CuCH3, CuC2H2, Cu2(HCO2)4(H2O)2, and Cu6H6(PH3)6 and the silver and gold diatomics AgH, AgO, AgS, Ag2, AgCu, AuH, AuO, AuS, Au2, AuCu, and AuAg. The DFT methods used were SVWN, BLYP, and BPW91, together with the DFT hybrids B3LYP and B3PW91. The calculations were carried out with the basis sets LANL2MB, LANL2DZ, 3-21G, and 6-311G (when available). The properties calculated were the molecular geometry, vibrational frequencies, and dissociation energies. It was found that all the DFT-based methods, particularly when allied with the LANL2DZ basis set, produced results which are significantly closer to experimental values than those of the traditional Moller−Plesset (MP2) electron correlation method and which are also applicable to considerably larger molecules. Over the whole test set of molecules, the RMS errors of the four “BX” methods, in conjunction with LANL2DZ, were typically 3−4% for geometries, 6−8% for frequencies, and 10−16% for dissociation energies, with BPW91 and the popular B3LYP at the lower and upper ends of these ranges, respectively, and with the errors being overestimates and underestimates, respectively. The corresponding values for SVWN and MP2 were 2% and 6%, 12% and 12%, and 33% and 42%, with these errors typically being ± and +, + and −, and + and −, with + and − representing overestimates and underestimates, respectively. While the best bond lengths are produced by SVWN (a local spin density approximation), which is not uncommmon, this advantage over the gradient corrected (BX) methods is only slight, and the latter are markedly superior for frequencies and especially dissociation energies. Not supported by the present results are the notions that (all) pure DFT methods underestimate metal−ligand bond lengths and overestimate bond strengths and that hybrid methods are superior (and neither that DFT methods are overcorrelated). Testing on a subset of molecules with BPW91/LANL2DZ revealed no benefit in supplementing this basis set by the addition of diffuse functions, nor of the counterpoise correction. There appear to be specific incompatibilities with some method/basis set combinations, and even the continuing availability of 3-21G for these metals is questionable. Because of its accuracy and reliability, the combination BPW91/LANL2DZ is recommended for these noble-metal systems (and to extensions such as the cluster-model approach to adsorption of a molecule on a metal surface).
The use of atomistic simulation methodologies based on empirical forcefields has enhanced our understanding of many physical processes governing protein structure and dynamics. However, the forcefields used in classical modeling studies are often designed for a particular class of proteins and rely on continuous improvement and validation by comparison of simulations with experimental data. We present a comprehensive comparison of five popular forcefields for simulating insulin. The effect of each forcefield on the conformational evolution and structural properties of the peptide is analyzed in detail and compared with available experimental results. In this study we observed that different forcefields favor different structural trends. However, the all-atom forcefield CHARMM27 and the united-atom forcefield GROMOS 43A1 delivered the best representation of the experimentally observed dynamic behavior of chain B of insulin.
We have conducted a series of theoretical simulations of insulin chain-B under different electric field conditions. This work extends our previous studies of the isolated chain-B by including chain-A and revealing the effects of chemical stress. For this complete protein, we observed increased stability under ambient conditions and under the application of thermal stress, compared to isolated chain-B. On the other hand, the presence of chain-A enhanced the effects of the applied electric field. Under the static field, the presence of chain-A lowered the strength of the field necessary to stretch the protein. Under the oscillating fields, there was relatively less stretching due to the competitive alignment process of the three helical regions with respect to the field. At high field strengths, we observed that the high frequency oscillating field caused less secondary structure disruption than a lower frequency field of the same strength.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.