The determination of the elastic modulus of the structural thermoplastic polymers is especially required during in-service monitoring of the components. This elasticity modulus determination can simplify the inspection process and predict the lifetime of the polymer being used. The elastic modulus of the polymer can be determined by pulse-echo method testing ultrasonic which is easier to use than transmission method. This research aims to determine elastic modulus of thermoplastic polymers i.e. polymethylmethaacrylate (acrylic), polyamide (nylon) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) calculated from measurement of velocity and attenuation of ultrasonic pulse-echo. The research begins by looking at the effect of the use of three different probes to ultrasonic velocity readings. Then elastic modulus of material polymers from ultrasonic velocity was calculated using standard equation. The elastic modulus was compared with the elastic modulus from mechanical testing. A linear model elastic modulus from ultrasonic reading which consists of velocity and apparent attenuation was developed. The results were elastic modulus value obtained from ultrasonic velocity and standard equation had a profound error 98% to 158%, especially for polymer with an eminently low density and high ratio of viscous property to elastic property. The attenuation from ultrasonic reading was influenced by the viscoelastic properties and the elastic modulus from ultrasonic velocity reading was influenced by the density. A linear model for thermoplastic elastic modulus determination based on ultrasonic pulse echo testing has been developed and could reduced the error to 3.45%.
Elastic modulus is one of the mechanical properties of the material that often used in industry or research field as a benchmark to determine materials' performance in term of withstanding load without being deformed. Destructive testing is perpetually used to determine this property. However, destructive testing needs a sample, and in situ testing is implausible. Various types of materials are used in the production process of the industry, e.g., polymers. Polymers have time-dependent properties, which can result in high variety value. By principle, ultrasonic inspection, which depends on sound velocity and density of materials, can be used to determine elastic modulus. Ultrasonic test with through-transmission method has been studied to determine elastic modulus and dynamic elastic modulus for polymers. For the sake of quality control and engineering design, ultrasonic pulse-echo contact is preferable. Ultrasonic testing was conducted with GE USM 35X device, which is a Pulse-Echo method and also contact method type of ultrasonic testing machine. Experiments were conducted on several types of polymers with frequency and thickness as experiment parameters. With an input of specimens' thickness, materials' sound velocity (ν) could be obtained. Thus results of ν were counted to attain the elastic modulus. Comparison between ultrasonic testing results and mechanical testing results of polymers' elastic modulus were performed to analyze the data. In this research, elastic modulus value obtained from the ultrasonic test has a profound error, up to 65% (minimum) and 388% (maximum), especially for a polymer with an eminently low density. Further research should be conducted because of the attenuation effect. Also, lower probe frequency eases the detection of alternating ultrasonic wave. Specimens' thickness adjusted with near-field calculation can eliminate the near-field effect, which is a natural phenomenon of the ultrasonic wave. However, it would not have yielded an accurate value because an excessive thickness will give an attenuation effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.