No abstract

The use of traditional electrocautery is prohibited in revision or replacement cochlear implant surgery because of the concern for end organ tissue damage. Additionally, electrical current spread to the malfunctioning device could interfere with an accurate cause-of-failure analysis. Clinical reports have confirmed the utility of the Shaw scalpel for dermatologic, ophthalmic, and head and neck surgery. The Shaw scalpel is a thermally activated cutting blade that provides a bloodless field through immediate capillary and small vessel hemostasis. Avoidance of wound and flap complications is of primary concern in cochlear implant surgery. The long-term wound healing compared favorably to that of other surgical cutting instruments in several experimental reports. We have routinely used the Shaw scalpel in revision cochlear implant surgery and in primary surgery whenever electrocautery was contraindicated. We have retrospectively evaluated 22 cases in which the Shaw scalpel was used for cochlear implant revision and primary surgery. The chart review included patient demographics, the indication for surgery, the contraindication for electrocautery, intraoperative surgical notes, the wound healing evaluation, the evaluation for alopecia, and postoperative speech understanding. No significant complications occurred intraoperatively, and the long-term wound healing results were no different from those obtained with conventional surgical techniques. The explanted devices were undamaged, and valuable diagnostic information could be obtained. All patients performed at or better than their preoperative levels on speech recognition testing. Our results indicate that the Shaw scalpel is a relatively safe, easy-to-use, and effective instrument.

BackgroundThe occurence of cholesteatoma and cochlear implant is rare. Secondary cholesteatomas may develop as a result of cochlear implant surgery. Primarily acquired cholesteatoma is not typically associated with congenital sensorineural hearing loss or cochlear implant in children. The occurrence of congenital cholesteatoma during cochlear implant surgery has never been reported before, partly because all patients are preoperatively submitted to imaging studies which can theoretically exclude the disease.Case presentationWe have reported a rare case of congenital cholesteatoma, found during sequential second side cochlear implantation in a 3-year-old child. The child underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months of age, before the first cochlear implant surgery, which excluded middle ear pathology. The mass was removed as an intact pearl, without visible or microscopic violation of the cholesteatoma capsule. All the areas where middle ear structures were touching the cholesteatoma were vaporized with a laser and the cochlear implant was inserted uneventfully. Further follow-up excluded residual disease.ConclusionWe believe that primary, single stage placement of a cochlear implant (CI) with simultaneous removal of the congenital cholesteatoma can be performed safely. However, to prevent recurrence, the capsule of the cholesteatoma must not be damaged and complete laser ablation of the surface, where suspicious epithelial cells could remain, is recommended. In our opinion, cholesteatoma removal and cochlear implantation should be staged if these conditions are not met, and/or the disease is at a more advanced stage. It is suspected, that the incidence of congenital cholesteatoma in pediatric CI candidates is much higher that in average pediatric population.