AbstractObjectivesCoronavirus (COVID-19) is a new respiratory disease that is spreading widely throughout the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women in Italy.MethodsWe considered 200 pregnancies attending our antenatal clinic. A questionnaire was sent to each woman in the days of maximum spread of COVID-19. Sectional was finalized to acquire in 18 items maternal characteristics and to test the women’s perception of infection. Section included the State–trait anxiety inventory (STAI) 40 items validated test for scoring trait anxiety (basal anxiety, STAI-T) and state anxiety (related to the ongoing pandemic, STAI-S). An abnormal value of STAI was considered when ≥40.ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 178 women (89%). Fear that COVID-19 could induce fetal structural anomalies was present in 47%, fetal growth restriction in 65% and preterm birth in 51% of the women. The median value of STAI-T was 37 and in 38.2% of the study group STAI-T score ≥40 was evidenced. STAI-S values were significantly higher with an increase of median values of 12 points (p≤0.0001). There was a positive linear correlation between STAI-T and STAI-S (Pearson=0.59; p≤0.0001). A higher educational status was associated with increased prevalence of STAI-S ≥ 40(p=0.004). Subgrouping women by the other variables considered did not show any further difference.ConclusionsCOVID-19 pandemic induces a doubling of the number of women who reached abnormal level of anxiety. These findings validate the role of the remote use of questionnaire for identifying women at higher risk of anxiety disorders allowing the activation of support procedures.

No abstract

Background In a multidisciplinary approach to Quality Management System and humanization of care, we aimed at evaluating the characteristics that influence the request of women to carry out Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC). Methods Skills have been improved, with the use of tests on dummies and case by case assessments. For the psychological-motivational study we have adopted: Informed consent, Semi-structured interview and Big Five Questionnaire. The women were recruited by both Gemelli and Cristo Re Hospital: the women following the counseling decided to undergo a second Caesarean Section (CS) (41, control group) and women who decided to complete a VBAC (22, experimental group). Results The analysis of the data shows that the women of the VBAC group are in the average between 31-35 years (57%), 80% has an education = or > at the 3rd level and the choice of the VBAC was conditioned by the partner (64%). The women of the control group are in average > 35 years (51%), 60% have a higher average education and the influence on the choice is oriented by the gynecologist/obstetrician (64%). From the personality test a statistically significant difference emerges between the dimensions Energy and Mental Opening. Past experience influences the choice of the next birth: women who are inclined to a second CS considered the previous CS as a positive event (66%) while only 36% in the VBAC group; 64% of this was the recovery of the painful post-surgery and a certain type of difficulty in the care of the child, in breastfeeding, of having suffered from post-partum mood alterations, which is why they chose to undertake a Trial of Labor After Cesarean. Conclusions The deeper knowledge of women as well as the preparation and safety of the same operators has shown that it is possible to perform a greater number of VBACs, with the sharing, participation and satisfaction of women and the entire team, leading to an improvement in outcomes and performance indexes. Key messages The promotion of care safety also improves the performance indexes through continuous training to the operators and the study of psychological aspects that lead to the choice to carry out a VBAC. Good Clinical Practice shown that it is possible to perform a greater number of VBACs, with the sharing, participation and satisfaction of women and the entire team.

The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection is a public health emergency of international concern. Pandemics pose a challenge to psychological resilience and can have an adverse impact on mental health. The impact of the ensuing social isolation and loneliness imposed by quarantine along with the worries about the risks of the infection and its economic fallout would appear likely to affect the mental health of the population. It has been reported that women are more likely to experience anxiety and depression symptoms during COVID-19 than men. COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the level of anxiety and depression of pregnant women according to their basal level and pregnancy characteristics. Antenatal mental disorders may be a risk factor for maternal mental health problems such as an increased likelihood of postnatal depression and adverse obstetric and developmental outcomes. Effective coping strategies are associated with better psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic, including reduced anxiety and depression. The increased risk of mental disorders due to COVID-19 requires policies to be developed to address prenatal and postpartum care to promote maternal-child wellbeing outcomes.