Objectives Loneliness is associated with psychiatric morbidity. Restrictions placed on the population during the first COVID‐19 lockdown may have disproportionately affected older adults, possibly through increasing loneliness. We sought to investigate this by examining loneliness in referrals to mental health of older adults (MHOA) services during the first UK COVID‐19 lockdown. Methods Referrals to MHOA services from a large South London catchment area were identified for the 16‐week period of the UK lockdown starting in March 2020 and for the corresponding period in 2019. A natural language processing algorithm identified loneliness in the patients' records. We applied logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity and diagnosis, to examine associations of loneliness in the study population. Results 1991 referrals were identified, 56.9% of whom were female, with a mean age of 77.9 years. Only 26.9% occurred during the 2020 lockdown, but with a higher prevalence of loneliness (22.0 vs. 17.7%, p = 0.028). In the whole sample, loneliness was associated with non‐accidental self‐injury (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.65), depressed mood (OR: 1.73), psychotic symptoms (OR: 1.65), relationship problems (OR: 1.49), problems with daytime activities (OR: 1.36), and antidepressant use (OR: 2.11). During lockdown, loneliness was associated with non‐accidental self‐injury (OR: 2.52), problem drinking or drug‐taking (OR 2.33), and antidepressant use (OR 2.10). Conclusions Loneliness is associated with more severe symptoms of affective illness, worse functional problems and increased use of antidepressant medication in older adults. During lockdown, loneliness in referrals to MHOA services increased and was associated with increased risk‐taking behaviour. Loneliness is a potential modifiable risk factor for mental illness, and efforts to minimise it in older adults should be prioritised as we emerge from the pandemic.

Facial hemangiomas are common benign tumors of infancy. They can mimic the appearance of bruises and parents report false accusations of child abuse by strangers. We investigated perceptions of facial hemangiomas in two professional groups involved in child abuse surveillance. Thirty health visitors and 30 primary school teachers were sent a clinical case questionnaire about a child with an involuting facial hemangioma with a color photograph of the lesion. Nineteen health visitors (63%) and 18 primary school teachers (60%) responded. Seventy-four percent of the health visitors and 11% of the teachers correctly diagnosed a hemangioma. Fifty percent of the teachers were unable to decide on a diagnosis. However, only one health visitor (5%) and one teacher (5%) thought that the lesion was a nonaccidental injury and would involve a child protection advisor. About one-third of health visitors and one-third of teachers expressed concerns that the child could suffer psychologically from teasing by peers at school and about one-third of health visitors were also concerned about the psychological effects of the lesion on the child's parents. Health visitors and teachers were most unlikely to mistake the facial hemangioma in this study for a nonaccidental injury.

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic the NHS has been transformed to meet the acute healthcare needs of these patients. This has significantly affected medical education, both undergraduate and postgraduate, with potential long-term implications for psychiatric recruitment. This article discusses these ramifications and the opportunities available, to mitigate them, as well as enhance the profile of psychiatry. Introduction: When it became clear that the first two cases of SARS-CoV-2 reported in the UK in January 2020 1 , represented an emerging pandemic, the NHS completely reconfigured its services. To meet the needs of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 elective treatments were cancelled, face-to-face appointments moved online, and huge numbers of healthcare workers were redeployed. Whilst mass transfers of staff to frontline roles were facilitated, movements of other healthcare workers were delayed or cancelled. 20,000 junior doctors due to rotate on the 1 st April 2020 were informed by Health Education England 2 that, except in exceptional circumstances, their rotations were cancelled 2. At the same time, medical students throughout the country faced widespread disruption of their studies 3. Both these events have resulted in a significant number of undergraduate and postgraduate medical trainees missing out on

Objectives: Social distancing restrictions in the COVID-19 pandemic may have had adverse effects on older adults' mental health. Whereby the impact on mood is welldescribed, less is known about psychotic symptoms. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics associated with psychotic symptoms during the first UK lockdown and a pre-pandemic comparison period. Methods:In this retrospective observational study we analysed anonymised records from patients referred to mental health services for older adults in South London in the 16-week period of the UK lockdown starting in March 2020, and in the comparable pre-pandemic period in 2019. We used logistic regression models to compare the associations of different patient characteristics with increased odds of presenting with any psychotic symptom (defined as hallucinations and/or delusion), hallucinations, or delusions, during lockdown and the corresponding pre-pandemic period.Results: 1991 referrals were identified. There were fewer referrals during lockdown but a higher proportion of presentations with any psychotic symptom (48.7% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.018), particularly hallucinations (41.0% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001). Patients of non-White ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.13-2.99) and patients with dementia (adjusted OR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.91-4.99) were more likely to be referred with psychotic symptoms during lockdown. While a weaker association between dementia and psychotic symptoms was found in the pre-COVID period (adjusted OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.19-2.03), interaction terms indicated higher odds of patients of non-White ethnicity or dementia to present with psychosis during the lockdown period.Latha Velayudhan and Christoph Mueller are joint senior authors.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Purpose of the studyTo ascertain factors influencing referral to, and outcomes from medical tribunals for junior doctors with less than 7 years of postgraduate training.Study designA mixed methods analysis of 49 publicly available determinations from the UK Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service (MPTS) between 2014 and 2020 was undertaken. Data on demographics, training grade, type of case and outcomes from the tribunal were recorded. A qualitative thematic analysis of the determinations was also undertaken, with themes being identified based on frequency and pertinence to the process of determination.ResultsThe largest group of junior doctors referred to an MPTS tribunal (38%) was those on the foundation programme; in their first 2 years postgraduation. Fifty-three per cent of all junior doctors referred to a tribunal were erased from the medical register. Erasure from the register was significantly associated with male gender, less than 4 years postqualification, non-attendance at the tribunal hearing, lack of legal representation and lack of insight or remorse at the tribunal hearing. Several cases involved dishonesty in relation to academic achievements and workplace-based assessments.ConclusionConsideration should be given as to how best to support the transition in professional identity from student to doctor. Teaching medical professionalism should be a priority in undergraduate and early postgraduate education, with lessons from fitness to practice tribunals shared for educational purposes.