The 36 Ar- 40 Ar vapor pressure isotope effect in the liquid and solid phases has been experimentally determined at about 100 temperatures between 83 and 97 K using a high-accuracy double-differential manometric technique. Differences between the vapor pressure of a highly enriched sample of 36 Ar and that of natural argon were measured simultaneously with the absolute vapor pressure of natural argon. Absolute and differential vapor pressure measurements show an estimated accuracy of 0.15% and 0.001%, respectively, with respect to the absolute vapor pressure of argon. Data were obtained in both the solid and liquid regions. The vapor pressure of 36 Ar is always higher than that of 40 Ar by about 0.5%. Triple-point temperatures and pressures were also measured for both isotopes. All data compare favorably with previous results reported in the literature and are nicely interpreted within the framework of Bigeleisen's theory of isotope effects. Using a large temperature extrapolation of our data, liquid-vapor isotope fractionation factors were successfully inferred from the vapor pressure measurements; the estimated values agree with the experimental ones up to close to the critical point. The isotopic difference in the molar enthalpies of vaporization and sublimation was also calculated from the vapor pressure data. Additionally, molar volume and second virial coefficient isotope effects are estimated using several different theoretical approaches.
At the highest metrological level, natural gas standards are commonly prepared gravimetrically as PSMs (primary standard mixtures). This international key comparison is a repeat of CCQM-K1e-g. The mixtures concerned contain nitrogen, carbon dioxide and the alkanes up to butane. The only difference with CCQM-K1e-g is the addition of iso-butane to the list. The results usually agree within 1% (or better) with the key comparison reference value. For ethane, nitrogen and carbon dioxide, the agreement is within 0.5% (or better), and for methane within 0.1% (or better) of the KCRV.Main text.
To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).
Densities and ultrasound speeds were determined in aqueous binary mixtures of 2-diethylaminoethanol over the whole composition range at intervals of 5 K in the temperature range between 283 and 303 K. Thermal expansibility effects on this amphiphile/water mixture are analysed in terms of excess molar isobaric expansions E E P;m for the mixture and of excess apparent molar isobaric expansions E E P;f;i for both chemical substances in the mixture. Different strategies are used and discussed for obtaining limiting (infinite dilution) excess partial molar isobaric expansions. Compressibility effects are described in terms of excess molar isentropic compressions K E S;m and excess partial molar isentropic compressions K E S;i . The latter properties are analytically calculated from the fit of experimental K E S;m data to a Redlich-Kister equation. A method based on this equation yields limiting excess partial molar isentropic compressions. Additionally, excess ultrasound speeds u E are also examined. All these excess properties are referred to a thermodynamically defined ideal liquid mixture. Interesting insights into the mixing process are gained from the visual impact of plots showing the composition and temperature dependence of different excess molar thermodynamic properties. Comparison of expansibility-and compressibility-related quantities shows that these two types of thermodynamic properties probe different aspects of intermolecular and packing effects on the process of mixing amphiphiles and water.y Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Tables S1-S4. See
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.