In patients with standard-risk malignancy, transplantation from unrelated HLA-allellically matched donors led to outcomes similar to those from HLA-identical sibling donors.
In many healthcare settings, benchmarking for complex procedures has become a mandatory requirement by competent authorities, regulators, payers and patients to assure clinical performance, cost-effectiveness and safe care of patients. In several countries inside and outside Europe, benchmarking systems have been established for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but access is not universal. As benchmarking is now integrated into the FACT-JACIE standards, the EBMT and JACIE established a Clinical Outcomes Group (COG) to develop and introduce a universal system accessible across EBMT members. Established systems from seven European countries (United Kingdom,
Summary:We evaluated the effect of individual and collective factors on the outcome of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at 35 French centres. Individual factors included patient and transplantation characteristics. Collective factors were related to the period and centre in which HSCT was performed. Two centre factors were studied: centre experience (ie number of HSCT performed during the study period) and the type of centre (paediatric or adult). All patients receiving a first allogeneic HSCT in France between 1st January 1993 and 31st December 1997 were included in the study. The follow-up period ended on 31st December 1997. The final sample included 2756 subjects. We analysed overall survival (OS) and transplant-related mortality (TRM). Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis, using Cox models. We found that centre experience had no significant effect on outcome. However, survival rates, whether determined on the basis of OS or TRM, were significantly higher in paediatric centres than in adult centres. Residual heterogeneity was found between adult centres. Survival rates were significantly higher for HSCT performed after 1st January 1996 than for those performed before this date.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.