First, a cohort of 103 JAK2 V617F-negative ET cases diagnosed between 1980 and 2013 at several Belgian hospitals was collected and analyzed for CALR and MPL mutations. We also collected a control cohort of 57 JAK2 V617F-positive ET patients diagnosed between 1987 and 2009 in the University Hospitals Leuven. The median follow-up of the whole cohort of 160 patients was 8 years (range, 1-34 years). Hematologic parameters (platelet counts, erythrocyte counts, leukocyte counts, hemoglobin, and hematocrit) at diagnosis were retrieved as was information on cardiovascular events and complications (arterial thrombosis, and venous events). During follow-up, progression to myelofibrosis, progression to acute myeloid leukemia, need for cytoreductive treatment, and presence of splenomegaly were recorded.

This retrospective multicenter study in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase was undertaken to confirm the clinical relevance of imatinib plasma concentrations monitoring in daily practice. Forty-one patients, with 47 imatinib plasma measurements, were analyzed during treatment with imatinib given at a fixed 400 mg daily dose. A significant inverse relationship of imatinib concentration with the patients' weight was observed (Pearson's test: p = 0.02, R 2 = 0.1). More interestingly, patients with poor response (switched to another tyrosine kinase inhibitor because of imatinib failure, or because of disease progression after an initial response) displayed a significantly lower mean imatinib concentration as compared to patients maintained on imatinib (822 ng/mL vs 1099 ng/mL; Student's t-test, p = 0.04). Failure or disease progression occurred more often in patients in the lowest quartile of imatinib concentrations compared to patients in the highest quartile (p = 0.02, logrank test). No correlation could be established with other biological or clinical parameter, including complete cytogenic response and major molecular response. In conclusion: in patients treated with imatinib at a fixed daily dose of 400 mg, imatinib plasma concentrations decreased with increasing body weight and were lower in patients switched to another tyrosine kinase inhibitor due to imatinib failure. Systematic determination of imatinib plasma trough levels should be encouraged in such patients.

No abstract

Introduction: Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with high-risk genetics and/or measurable residual disease (MRD) are at high-risk of disease recurrence. In the previous GRAALL-2005 study, we identified KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2A-r), IKZF1 intragenic deletion (IKZF1del) and post-induction (TP1, week 6) MRD ≥ 0.01% as independent factors to predict relapse in Ph-negative B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL (Beldjord K, Blood 2014). In the GRAALL-2014 trial, high-risk (HR) patients were thus defined by the presence of at least one of these three factors. Among them, only those with higher MRD levels defined as TP1-MRD ≥ 0.1% and/or week 12 (TP2) MRD ≥ 0.01% were considered at very high risk (VHR) and proposed allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) in first remission (Dhedin et al., Blood 2015). Since October 2018, all these patients were eligible to be included in the GRAALL-2014-QUEST phase 2 study to receive blinatumomab as part of consolidation and maintenance phases or as a bridge to transplant. Methods: From October 2018 to December 2020, 95 patients with high-risk Ph-negative BCP-ALL without central nervous system involvement at diagnosis and in continuous complete remission after induction and consolidation 1, were prospectively included to start blinatumomab at week 12. One patient was excluded because of T-ALL phenotype (with CD19 aberrant expression). Patients with alloSCT indication and a stem cell source received blinatumomab 28 microg/d administered by continuous intravenous infusion (cIV) until transplant. A minimum of 4 weeks blinatumomab was recommended before proceeding to transplantation. All other patients received 5 cycles of blinatumomab 28 microg/day cIV (for 28 days), during consolidation 2 and 3 and at months 1/3/5 of the maintenance phase respectively. The primary objective was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives included post-blinatumomab MRD response at TP3 (after consolidation 2 or before alloSCT), overall survival (OS), and safety. Early results are reported here. Results: Median age was 35 years old (range, 18-60). Median white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis was 12 G/L (range, 1-449). Oncogenetic analyses allowed classifying ALL as Ph-like (18%), KMT2A-r (17%), DUX4/ERGdel (13%), ZNF384-r (11%), low hypodiploidy/near triploidy (7%), B-other (26%) or unknown (9%). An IKZF1del was found in 37/93 (40%). A TP1-MRD ≥ 0.01% was found in 46/94 patients (49%). Final risk group was HR for 45 patients and VHR for 49 patients. Last pre-blinatumomab MRD was <0.01% in 49/88 (56%) of evaluable patients. A total of 40 patients (42%) received an alloSCT. The median number of blinatumomab cycles received in patients not proceeding to alloSCT was 4 cycles (range, 1-5). Thirty-nine severe adverse events (SAEs) were reported: 1 CRS (grade 2), 8 neurotoxicities (1 grade 2, 3 grade 3, 3 grade 4, 1 grade 5), 19 infections, and 11 others. The only grade 5 SAE occurred after alloSCT (seizures). After blinatumomab, a complete MRD response (with at least 0.01% sensitivity) was achieved in 61/82 (74%) evaluable patients and in evaluable patients with pre-blinatumomab detectable MRD. MRD response to blinatumomab was lower in patients with high pre-blinatumomab MRD level, while not impacted by age, WBC, or oncogenic subgroup. With a median follow-up of 20 months, 18-month DFS and OS was 78.8% (95% CI [66.9-86.8]) and 92.1% (95% CI [83.2-96.4]) respectively (Figure 1). Patients with VHR diseases had a worse DFS (68.8%, 95% CI [51.1-81.2]) as compared to other patients (90.6%, 95% CI [72.1-97.1]); p=0.018). This difference of DFS was abrogated by censoring patients at transplant (VHR 88.1%, 95% CI [65.5-96.3] versus others 90.6%, 95% CI [72.1-97.1%], p=0.10). Other factors significantly associated with better DFS were DUX4/ERGdel subgroup, low pre-blinatumomab MRD, and complete MRD response after blinatumomab. Conclusion. In patients wih high-risk BCP-ALL, blinatumomab added to consolidation is safe and gives promising results. A comparison to similar patients treated in the same GRAALL-2014 study before October 2018 is planned with a longer follow-up. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Boissel: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SANOFI: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation. Delabesse: Astellas: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Dombret: Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding; pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; servier: Research Funding; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Blinatumomab in frontline high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia