EEG involves the recording, analysis, and interpretation of voltages recorded on the human scalp which originate from brain gray matter. EEG is one of the most popular methods of studying and understanding the processes that underlie behavior. This is so, because EEG is relatively cheap, easy to wear, light weight and has high temporal resolution. In terms of behavior, this encompasses actions, such as movements that are performed in response to the environment. However, there are methodological difficulties which can occur when recording EEG during movement such as movement artifacts. Thus, most studies about the human brain have examined activations during static conditions. This article attempts to compile and describe relevant methodological solutions that emerged in order to measure body and brain dynamics during motion. These descriptions cover suggestions on how to avoid and reduce motion artifacts, hardware, software and techniques for synchronously recording EEG, EMG, kinematics, kinetics, and eye movements during motion. Additionally, we present various recording systems, EEG electrodes, caps and methods for determinating real/custom electrode positions. In the end we will conclude that it is possible to record and analyze synchronized brain and body dynamics related to movement or exercise tasks.

Abstract-Electromyogenic or muscle artifacts constitute a major problem in studies involving electroencephalography (EEG) measurements. This is because the rather low signal activity of the brain is overlaid by comparably high signal activity of muscles, especially neck muscles. Hence, recording an artifact-free EEG signal during movement or physical exercise is not, to the best knowledge of the authors, feasible at the moment. Nevertheless, EEG measurements are used in a variety of different fields like diagnosing epilepsy and other brain related diseases or in biofeedback for athletes.Muscle artifacts can be recorded using electromyography (EMG). Various computational methods for the reduction of muscle artifacts in EEG data exist like the ICA algorithm InfoMax and the AMICA algorithm. However, there exists no objective measure to compare different algorithms concerning their performance on EEG data.We defined a test protocol with specific neck and body movements and measured EEG and EMG simultaneously to compare the InfoMax algorithm and the AMICA algorithm. A novel objective measure enabled to compare both algorithms according to their performance. Results showed that the AMICA algorithm outperformed the InfoMax algorithm. In further research, we will continue using the established objective measure to test the performance of other algorithms for the reduction of artifacts.

Analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) recorded during movement is often aggravated or even completely hindered by electromyogenic artifacts. This is caused by the overlapping frequencies of brain and myogenic activity and the higher amplitude of the myogenic signals. One commonly employed computational technique to reduce these types of artifacts is Independent Component Analysis (ICA). ICA estimates statistically independent components (ICs) that, when linearly combined, closely match the input (sensor) data. Removing the ICs that represent artifact sources and re-mixing the sources returns the input data with reduced noise activity. ICs of real-world data are usually not perfectly separated, actual sources, but a mixture of these sources. Adding additional input signals, predominantly generated by a single IC that is already part of the original sensor data, should increase that IC's separability. We conducted this study to evaluate this concept for ICA-based electromyogenic artifact reduction in EEG using EMG signals as additional inputs. To acquire the appropriate data we worked with nine human volunteers. The EEG and EMG were recorded while the study volunteers performed seven exercises designed to produce a wide range of representative myogenic artifacts. To evaluate the effect of the EMG signals we estimated the sources of each dataset once with and once without the EMG data. The ICs were automatically classified as either `myogenic' or `non-myogenic'. We removed the former before back projection. Afterwards we calculated an objective measure to quantify the artifact reduction and assess the effect of including EMG signals. Our study showed that the ICA-based reduction of electromyogenic artifacts can be improved by including the EMG data of artifact-inducing muscles. This approach could prove beneficial for locomotor disorder research, brain-computer interfaces, neurofeedback, and most other areas where brain activity during movement has to be analyzed.

No abstract