INTRODUCTION:There is lack of clarity on the impact of using simulation as a teaching strategy in novice learners. This study aims to determine whether the number and duration of training sessions influence the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills in naı ¨ve learners.METHODS: One hundred medical students were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 groups. Group A underwent a single orientation and supervised practice session of 3 hours duration. Group B underwent distributed teaching with 3 learning sessions of 1 hour each spread over 3 consecutive weeks. Each participant received visual and manual demonstration of 3 basic laparoscopic tasks. Participant performance were evaluated before (pretest) and after the intervention (immediate post-test), and at 3-and 6-month intervals.RESULTS: Pretest and immediate post-test scores were comparable between the 2 groups. The 3-month interval test showed a significant difference between the 2 groups, with higher scores in group B (difference ¼ e2.90; p ¼ 0.000). The 6-month interval test showed no significant differences in performance between the 2 groups (p ¼ 0.178).In both groups, there were significant improvements in performance between the pretest and the immediate post-test (p ¼ 0.000). However, at 3-and 6-month tests there was a significant decline in the performance of both groups compared with the immediate post-test (p ¼ 0.000).
CONCLUSION:In learners naı ¨ve to laparoscopy, distributed teaching resulted in better acquisition of psychomotor skills at 3 months post-test assessment (p ¼ 0.000). However, both teaching strategies yielded similar retention of skills at the 6-month assessment, suggesting the need for repeated intervention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.