The human hand is capable of performing countless grasps and gestures that are the basis for social activities. However, which grasps contribute the most to the manipulation skills needed during collaborative tasks, and thus which grasps should be included in a robot companion, is still an open issue. Here, we investigated grasp choice and hand placement on objects during a handover when subsequent tasks are performed by the receiver and when in-hand and bimanual manipulation are not allowed. Our findings suggest that, in this scenario, human passers favor precision grasps during such handovers. Passers also tend to grasp the purposive part of objects and leave “handles” unobstructed to the receivers. Intuitively, this choice allows receivers to comfortably perform subsequent tasks with the objects. In practice, many factors contribute to a choice of grasp, e.g., object and task constraints. However, not all of these factors have had enough emphasis in the implementation of grasping by robots, particularly the constraints introduced by a task, which are critical to the success of a handover. Successful robotic grasping is important if robots are to help humans with tasks. We believe that the results of this work can benefit the wider robotics community, with applications ranging from industrial cooperative manipulation to household collaborative manipulation.

The way an object is released by the passer to a partner is fundamental for the success of the handover and for the experienced fluency and quality of the interaction. Nonetheless, although its apparent simplicity, object handover involves a complex combination of predictive and reactive control mechanisms that were not fully investigated so far. Here, we show that passers use visual-feedback based anticipatory control to trigger the beginning of the release, to launch the appropriate motor program, and adapt such predictions to different speeds of the receiver’s reaching out movements. In particular, the passer starts releasing the object in synchrony with the collision with the receiver, regardless of the receiver’s speed, but the passer’s speed of grip force release is correlated with receiver speed. When visual feedback is removed, the beginning of the passer’s release is delayed proportionally with the receiver’s reaching out speed; however, the correlation between the passer’s peak rate of change of grip force is maintained. In a second study with 11 participants receiving an object from a robotic hand programmed to release following stereotypical biomimetic profiles, we found that handovers are experienced as more fluent when they exhibit more reactive release behaviours, shorter release durations, and shorter handover durations. The outcomes from the two studies contribute understanding of the roles of sensory input in the strategy that empower humans to perform smooth and safe handovers, and they suggest methods for programming controllers that would enable artificial hands to hand over objects with humans in an easy, natural and efficient way.

Humans perform object manipulation in order to execute a specific task. Seldom is such action started with no goal in mind. In contrast, traditional robotic grasping (first stage for object manipulation) seems to focus purely on getting hold of the object -neglecting the goal of the manipulation. Most metrics used in robotic grasping do not account for the final task in their judgement of quality and success. In this paper we suggest a change of perspective. Since the overall goal of a manipulation task shapes the actions of humans and their grasps, we advocate that the task itself should shape the metric of success. To this end, we propose a new metric centred on the task. Finally, we call for action to support the conversation and discussion on such an important topic for the community.

Task-aware robotic grasping is critical if robots are to successfully cooperate with humans. The choice of a grasp is multi-faceted; however, the task to perform primes this choice in terms of hand shaping and placement on the object. This grasping strategy is particularly important for a robot companion, as it can potentially hinder the success of the collaboration with humans. In this work, we investigate how different grasping strategies of a robot passer influence the performance and the perceptions of the interaction of a human receiver. Our findings suggest that a grasping strategy that accounts for the subsequent task of the receiver improves substantially the performance of the human receiver in executing the subsequent task. The time to complete the task is reduced by eliminating the need of a post-handover re-adjustment of the object. Furthermore, the human perceptions of the interaction improve when a task-oriented grasping strategy is adopted. The influence of the robotic grasp strategy increases as the constraints induced by the object's affordances become more restrictive. The results of this work can benefit the wider robotics community, with application ranging from industrial to household human-robot interaction for cooperative and collaborative object manipulation.