Background: Limited data are available on the clinical course of patients with history of atrial fibrillation (AF) when admitted in an intensive care environment. We aimed to describe the occurrence of major adverse events in AF patients admitted to a stepdown care unit (SDU) and to analyse clinical factors associated with outcomes, impact of dicumarolic oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy impact and performance of clinical risk scores in this setting. Materials and methods: Single-centre, observational retrospective analysis on a population of subjects with AF history admitted to a SDU. Therapeutic failure (composite of transfer to ICU or death) was considered the main study outcome. Occurrence of stroke and major bleeding (MH) was considered as secondary outcomes. The performance of clinical risk scores was evaluated. Results: A total of 1430 consecutive patients were enrolled. 194 (13.6%) reported the main outcome. Using multivariate logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a a marker of bacterial infection. Its prognostic role in the critically-ill patient, however, is still object of debate. Aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of admission PCT (apct) in assessing the prognosis of the critically-ill patient regardless the presence of bacterial infection. A single-cohort, single-center retrospective study was performed evaluating critically-ill patients admitted to a stepdown care unit. Age, sex, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS-II), shock, troponin-I, aPCT, serum creatinine, cultures and clinical endpoints (in-hospital mortality or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) transfer) were collected. Time free from adverse event (TF-AE) was defined as the time between hospitalization and occurrence of one of the clinical endpoints, and calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves. We engineered a new predictive model (POCS) adopting aPCT, age and shock. We enrolled 1063 subjects: 450 reached the composite outcome of death or ICU transfer. aPCT was significantly higher in this group, where it predicted TF-AE both in septic and non-septic patients. aPCT and POCS showed a good prognostic performance in the whole sample, both in septic and non-septic patients. aPCT showed a good prognostic accuracy, adding informations on the rapidity of clinical deterioration. pocS model reached a performance similar to SApS-ii. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a pro-hormone of human calcitonin synthesized by the parafollicular C cells of the thyroid and involved in calcium homeostasis. PCT is produced in large quantities by different cell types in patients affected by bacterial infections 1. Several studies have shown low-to moderately-elevated PCT levels also among critically-ill patients without evidence of infection (trauma, major surgery, multi-organ failure and myocardial infarction) 2,3. Clinically, PCT represents a quantitative biomarker which is currently used to help predicting the probability of bacterial infections 4 and guide the duration of antibiotic therapy 5. PCT demonstrated not only a diagnostic, but also an elevated prognostic value in septic patients. A recent meta-analysis concluded that increased PCT concentrations and absence of PCT clearance were strongly associated with all-cause mortality in septic patients 6. Clinical and pathophysiological data suggest a role of PCT in prognostic evaluation of critically-ill patients regardless the presence of a bacterial infection 7 , but large and conclusive data are still lacking. Main objective of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of PCT, evaluated as a single assay at the admission (aPCT) within the first 12 hours, in critically-ill patients regardless of the presence of bacterial infection. We also engineered a new predictive model, named "Procalcitonin and Other Clinical Score" (POCS), adopting both clinical and laboratoristic variables (aPCT, age and shock), to improve the prediction of outcomes and compared its performances with other validated prognostic markers, as Troponin I (TnI) 8 and the Simplified ...

No abstract

Background and Objectives: bedside cardiac ultrasound is a widely adopted method in Emergency Departments (ED) for extending physical examination and refining clinical diagnosis. However, in the setting of hemodynamically-stable pulmonary embolism, the diagnostic role of echocardiography is still the subject of debate. In light of its high specificity and low sensitivity, some authors suggest that echocardiographic signs of right ventricle overload could be used to rule-in pulmonary embolism. In this study, we aimed to clarify the diagnostic role of echocardiographic signs of right ventricle overload in the setting of hemodynamically-stable pulmonary embolism in the ED. Materials and Methods: we performed a systematic review of literature in PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane databases, considering the echocardiographic signs for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the ED. Studies considering unstable or shocked patients were excluded. Papers enrolling hemodynamically stable subjects were selected. We performed a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis for each sign, and then performed a critical evaluation according to pretest probability, assessed with Wells’ score for pulmonary embolism. Results: 10 studies were finally included. We observed a good specificity and a low sensitivity of each echocardiographic sign of right ventricle overload. However, once stratified by the Wells’ score, the post-test probability only increased among high-risk patients. Conclusions: signs of echocardiographic right ventricle overload should not be used to modify the clinical behavior in low- and intermediate- risk patients according to Wells’ score classification. Among high-risk patients, however, echocardiographic signs could help a physician in detecting patients with the highest probability of pulmonary embolism, necessitating a confirmation by computed tomography with pulmonary angiography. However, a focused cardiac and thoracic ultrasound investigation is useful for the differential diagnosis of dyspnea and chest pain in the ED.

No abstract