Introduction: In recent years, there has been a growing development of molecularly targeted therapies for various types of solid tumors—in particular, in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This has required the need for greater quantities of tissue that is able to support ancillary studies, alongside cyto-histological diagnoses for the assessment of molecular targets. Conventional TBNA (cTBNA) and EBUS-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) have shown a high diagnostic yield for malignant mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node enlargement and peribronchial masses; however, few studies have compared these two procedures. We retrospectively compared TBNA patients (EBUS-TBNA and cTBNA) in order to determine the diagnostic yield and material adequacy for subsequent ancillary analyses. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 318 patients with clinical suspicion of lung cancer or with disease recurrence. All of the patients underwent TBNA (either EBUS-TBNA or cTBNA) on enlarged mediastinal and/or hilar lymph nodes and peribronchial masses between January 2017 and June 2021 at the University Hospital of Pisa, Italy. After a definitive diagnosis, molecular analyses and an evaluation of PD-L1 expression were performed in the cases of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and NSCLC, not otherwise specified (NOS). Results: EBUS-TBNA was performed in 199 patients and cTBNA was performed in 119 patients with 374 and 142 lymph nodes, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield for positive diagnoses was 59% (diagnostic rate of 61% in EBUS-TBNA, and 55% in cTBNA). Adenocarcinoma (ADC) was the most frequent diagnosis in both methods. EBUS-TBNA diagnostic adequacy was 72% for molecular analysis, while it was 55.5% for cTBNA, showing a statistical trend (p = 0.08) towards the significance of EBUS. The average percentage of neoplastic cells was also statistically different between the two methods (p = 0.05), reaching 51.19 ± 22.14 in EBUS-TBNA and 45.25 ± 22.84 in cTBNA. With regard to the PD-L1 protein expression, the percentage of positivity was similar in both procedures (86% in EBUS-TBNA, 85% in cTBNA). Conclusions: Conventional TBNA (cTBNA) and EBUS-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) are minimally invasive diagnostic methods that are associated with a high diagnostic yield. However, EBUS-TBNA has an improved diagnostic adequacy for molecular analysis compared to cTBNA, and is associated with a higher average percentage of neoplastic cells.

The tall-cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (TCPTC) is the most common aggressive variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and typically occurs in older patients. In this study, we analyzed retrospectively the largest mono-institutional series of PTCs with tall-cell features (989 patients) over a 17-year period, re-evaluating tumors based on age at presentation and outcomes in different age groups. We divided patients into three age groups following different criteria (the criterion from the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Node Metastasis (AJCC TNM) guidelines, criterion for the statistical division into tertiles and adolescent/post-adolescent criterion) to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics in different age groups, especially in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). We obtained three main results: 1. the population is distributed among the different age groups, and therefore, this type of cancer is not exclusively found among those of an older age; 2. in the RFS analysis, we can see a higher probability of local recurrence in the younger and older groups and, unexpectedly, a lower probability of local recurrence in the “median age” group; and 3. in the DRFS analysis, we can observe a higher probability of distant recurrence in older patients. From a molecular perspective, no significant differences in the mutational status of BRAF were detected according to different age groups, while mutations in the TERT promoter were exclusively present in older patients of all age groups, highlighting the potential prognostic implications of TERT promoter mutations in PTCs. In conclusion, the results of this series confirm that TC morphology alone in PTCs does not have the same negative prognostic significance in the younger population as in the older population. The reason for these different outcomes remains unclear and needs further studies.