Immunodetection on mouse routinely processed tissue via antibodies raised in mice faces cross-reactivity of the secondary anti-mouse reagents with endogenous immunoglobulins, which permeate the tissue. Various solutions to this problem have been devised and include endogenous Ig block with anti-mouse Fab fragments or directly conjugated primary antibodies. Mouse isotype-specific antibodies, differently from reagents directed against both heavy and light chains, fail to detect endogenous Ig after fixation and embedding, while providing a clean and specific detection system for mouse antibodies on mouse routinely processed tissue.

Background: Antibody validation for tissue staining is required for reproducibility; criteria to ensure validity have been published recently. The majority of these recommendations imply the use of routinely processed (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) tissue. Materials & methods: We applied to lightly fixed frozen sections a panel of 126 antibodies validated for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue with extended criteria. Results: Less than 30% of the antibodies performed as expected with all fixations. 35% preferred one fixation over another, 13% gave nonspecific staining and 23% did not stain at all. Conclusion: Individual antibody variability of the paratope’s fitness for the fixed antigen may be the cause. Revalidation of established antibody panels is required when they are applied to sections whose fixation and processing are different from the tissue where they were initially validated.

Antigen-bearing proteins become progressively unavailable to immunodetection after prolonged storage of routine sections, exposed to a variety of agents, such as moisture, oxygen, and temperature. By proteomic analysis, the antigens are retained in the sections and definitely in the tissue block, pointing to fixation-independent, storage time–dependent protein modifications. Based on previous experience, we hypothesized that a combined exposure to a reducing agent and to chemicals favoring protein conformation changes would reverse the masking in aged sections. Disaccharides, lactose and sucrose, and a surfactant, added to a standard antigen retrieval buffer, reverse the negative changes in aged sections. Furthermore, they provide enhanced access to antigens in freshly cut sections, but not universally, revealing additional factors, besides heat and calcium chelation, required for antigen retrieval of individual proteins:

A customized context-dependent validation of antibodies for the prospective use, rather than a general stamp of validity, is required for reproducibility and data validity, besides the need of standardized reagents. In-situ antibody staining is a technique broadly used in experimental settings and human diagnostic practice. The first typically, but not exclusively uses lightly fixed material (cell smears, frozen sections), the second, routinely processed formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded (FFPE) tissue. Differently from techniques based on tissue extraction, there is little awareness of the context-dependent constraints inherent with either type of in situ staining except that antigen masking associated with routine tissue processing limits the range of useful antibodies. We applied a panel of 126 antibodies validated for FFPE to lightly fixed (acetone, formalin) frozen sections and found that less than 30% performed conservatively with all fixations, 35% preferred one fixation over another, 13% gave non-specific staining, 23% did not stain at all. Individual antibody variegation of the paratope fitness for the differentially fixed antigen may be the cause. Re-validation of established antibody panels is required when applied to sections whose fixation and processing is different from the tissue where they have been initially validated.

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) has a limited range of diversified, personalized therapeutic opportunities, besides DNA hypermutating cases; thus, both new targets or broadening existing strategies for personalized intervention are of interest. Routinely processed material from 246 untreated COADs with clinical follow‐up was probed for evidence of DNA damage response (DDR), that is, the gathering of DDR‐associated molecules at discrete nuclear spots, by multiplex immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical staining for DDR complex proteins (γH2AX, pCHK2, and pNBS1). We also tested the cases for type I interferon response, T‐lymphocyte infiltration (TILs), and mutation mismatch repair defects (MMRd), known to be associated with defects of DNA repair. FISH analysis for chromosome 20q copy number variations was obtained. A total of 33.7% of COAD display a coordinated DDR on quiescent, non‐senescent, non‐apoptotic glands, irrespective of TP53 status, chromosome 20q abnormalities, and type I IFN response. Clinicopathological parameters did not differentiate DDR+ cases from the other cases. TILs were equally present in DDR and non‐DDR cases. DDR+ MMRd cases were preferentially retaining wild‐type MLH1. The outcome after 5FU‐based chemotherapy was not different in the two groups. DDR+ COAD represents a subgroup not aligned with known diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic categories, with potential new targeted treatment opportunities, exploiting the DNA damage repair pathways.