Background
Although experts agree that strict dietary compliance is fundamental for the health of celiac patients, there are no evidence-based recommendations on the best way to assess dietary compliance. Detection of gluten immunogenic peptides (GIPs) in feces was recently proposed as an effective method of assessing the dietary compliance of celiac patients.
Methods
Fifty-five consecutive celiac patients (27 adults and 28 children, age 6-72 years), who had been on a gluten-free diet for at least 2 years, were enrolled. All patients were evaluated clinically for symptoms, physical parameters and laboratory parameters. Dietary compliance was assessed with the Biagi questionnaire and serum anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies were measured. GIPs were determined by immunoenzymatic assay on an automated Chorus analyzer (DIESSE Diagnostica Senese), after extraction of fecal samples by the method developed by DIESSE.
Results
Eight patients tested positive for GIPs (GIPs+); 71.4% of GIP-positive patients were asymptomatic; tTG antibodies were detected in 3/8 GIP+ patients. The Biagi score was significantly associated with fecal positivity for GIPs (P=0.02). However, according to the Biagi score, 57.1% of GIP+ patients followed the diet strictly and 5.4% of GIP- subjects did not comply with the diet or made substantial mistakes.
Conclusions
Assay of fecal GIPs identified more patients who did not comply with the diet than did the Biagi questionnaire, evaluation of symptoms or anti-tTG antibodies. Detection of fecal GIPs offers a direct, objective, quantitative assessment of even occasional exposure to gluten and is confirmed as a practical way to check dietary compliance.
CKG helped write the paper. S helped analyzed the genetic data. MGS provided patient history and clinical information. IR provided patient history and clinical information. HJM analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Summary
High genetic heterogeneity in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) increases the likelihood of efficient immune response to pathogens and tumours. As measure of HLA diversity, HLA evolutionary divergence (HED) has been shown to predict the response of tumours to immunotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adults. We retrospectively investigated the association of HED with outcomes of 153 paediatric/young adults patients, treated for malignant disorders with HSCT from 9–10/10 HLA‐matched unrelated donors. HED was calculated as pairwise genetic distance between alleles in patient HLA‐A, ‐B, ‐C, ‐DRB1, ‐DQB1 and ‐DPB1, using the locus median to stratify patients with ‘high’ or ‘low’ HED. Patients with high HED‐B and ‐DRB1 showed significantly improved disease‐free survival (DFS), especially when combined (70.8% vs 53.7% p = 0.008). High HED‐B + ‐DRB1 was also associated with improved overall survival (OS) (82.1 vs 66.4% p = 0.014), and concomitant reduction of non‐relapse‐mortality (5.1% vs 21.1% p = 0.006). The impact on OS and DFS of combined HED‐B + ‐DRB1 was confirmed in multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39, p = 0.009; and HR 0.45, p = 0.007 respectively]. Only high HED scores for HLA‐DPB1 were associated, in univariate analysis, with reduced incidence of relapse (15.9% vs 31.1%, p = 0.03). These results support HED as prognostic marker in allogeneic HSCT and, if confirmed in larger cohorts, would allow its use to inform clinical risk and potentially influence clinical practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.