No abstract

Objective: Cardiac auscultation is an accessible diagnostic screening tool that can help to identify patients with heart murmurs for follow-up diagnostic screening and treatment, especially in resource-constrained environments. However, experts are needed to interpret the heart sound recordings, limiting the accessibility of auscultation for cardiac care. The George B. Moody PhysioNet Challenge 2022 invites teams to develop automated approaches for detecting abnormal heart function from multi-location phonocardiogram (PCG) recordings of heart sounds. Approach: For the Challenge, we sourced 5272 PCG recordings from 1568 pediatric patients in rural Brazil. We required the Challenge participants to submit the complete code for training and running their models, improving the transparency, reproducibility, and utility of the diagnostic algorithms. We devised a cost-based evaluation metric that captures the costs of screening, treatment, and diagnostic errors, allowing us to investigate the benefits of algorithmic pre-screening and facilitate the development of more clinically relevant algorithms. Main results: So far, over 80 teams have submitted over 600 algorithms during the course of the Challenge, representing a diversity of approaches in academia and industry. We will update this manuscript to share an analysis of the Challenge after the end of the Challenge. Significance: The use of heart sound recordings for both heart murmur detection and clinical outcome identification allowed us to explore the potential of automated approaches to provide accessible pre-screening of less-resourced populations. The submission of working, open-source algorithms and the use of novel evaluation metrics supported the reproducibility, generalizability, and relevance of the researched conducted during the Challenge.

It is recognized that public health intervention targeted toward changing lifestyle behaviors to reduce overweight status is a considerable challenge. It is important that individuals recognize their overweight status as a health risk in order for an effective change in lifestyle behaviors to occur, and growing evidence suggests that actual weight and perception of weight status often do not match, especially among adolescents. In this article, we explore the extent to which exposure to heavier peers and parents affects misperception of their own weight status by adolescents. Using data from a nationally representative sample of adolescents, we estimated instrumental variable models with school-level fixed effects to account for bidirectionality of peer influence and environmental confounders. Our results indicate that individuals who live in an environment that exposes them to overweight/obese parents and heavier peers tend to misperceive their weight status and think of themselves to be of lower weight than they actually are. Our analysis also revealed differential effects by gender and type of peers.

ObjectiveArtificial intelligence (AI) may reduce underdiagnosed or overlooked upper GI (UGI) neoplastic and preneoplastic conditions, due to subtle appearance and low disease prevalence. Only disease-specific AI performances have been reported, generating uncertainty on its clinical value.DesignWe searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus until July 2020, for studies on the diagnostic performance of AI in detection and characterisation of UGI lesions. Primary outcomes were pooled diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of AI. Secondary outcomes were pooled positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values. We calculated pooled proportion rates (%), designed summary receiving operating characteristic curves with respective area under the curves (AUCs) and performed metaregression and sensitivity analysis.ResultsOverall, 19 studies on detection of oesophageal squamous cell neoplasia (ESCN) or Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia (BERN) or gastric adenocarcinoma (GCA) were included with 218, 445, 453 patients and 7976, 2340, 13 562 images, respectively. AI-sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV/positive likelihood ratio/negative likelihood ratio for UGI neoplasia detection were 90% (CI 85% to 94%)/89% (CI 85% to 92%)/87% (CI 83% to 91%)/91% (CI 87% to 94%)/8.2 (CI 5.7 to 11.7)/0.111 (CI 0.071 to 0.175), respectively, with an overall AUC of 0.95 (CI 0.93 to 0.97). No difference in AI performance across ESCN, BERN and GCA was found, AUC being 0.94 (CI 0.52 to 0.99), 0.96 (CI 0.95 to 0.98), 0.93 (CI 0.83 to 0.99), respectively. Overall, study quality was low, with high risk of selection bias. No significant publication bias was found.ConclusionWe found a high overall AI accuracy for the diagnosis of any neoplastic lesion of the UGI tract that was independent of the underlying condition. This may be expected to substantially reduce the miss rate of precancerous lesions and early cancer when implemented in clinical practice.