Background: There are different etching gels available, which have different composition, different pH, and different viscosity, and there is little information in the literature comparing all these products. Objective: To evaluate the mean microshear bond strength and morphological characteristics of tooth enamel by evaluating different phosphoric acids combined with a universal adhesive system. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four enamel samples were used, which were divided according to the acid conditioning: G1: Scotchbond Etchant (3M Oral Care), G2: Ultra-Etch (Ultradent), G3: Eco-Etch (IvoclarVivadent), G4: ETCH-37 with BAC (Bisco), G5: Etching gel (Densell), G6: Condac 37 (FGM), and G7: Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M Oral Care) in self-etch mode. For the adhesive procedure, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive was the one used as indicated the manufacturer's instructions, 0.9-mm-diameter resin cylinders were placed. The microshear bond strength test was performed after being stored for 24 hours in water. The morphological characteristics of tooth enamel were analyzed using the Raman confocal microscope alpha300RA. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Tukey post-test were used to analyze the differences between the groups. Results: The mean microshear bond strength values obtained for groups 1, 4, 5 were significantly greater than groups 2, 3, 6 and 7 (p < .05). All groups presented demineralization after the application of the etching acid, and few signs of demineralization were evident in group 7. Conclusions: Acid-etching with ETCH-37 with BAC, Etching gel, and Scotchbond Etchant improved the adhesive strength in the enamel using an universal adhesive, and acid-etching with Condac 37, Ultra-Etch, and Eco-Etch provides similar adhesive strength values to self-etch mode of universal adhesive. Clinical Significance: All acid etchants should be considered as different. The test confirms that enamel etching prior to the application of a universal adhesive system depends on the selected acid etchand product.