Further studies are needed to produce clear guidelines to define the best choice in terms of clinical outcomes, function and complications.

Purpose In this prospective, double-center cohort study, we aim to assess how the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) potentially varies between a group of patients with anatomic ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring grafts 6 months postoperatively and a healthy ACL control group, and how MRI-based graft signal intensity is related to knee laxity. Methods Sixty-two consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft were prospectively invited to participate in this study, and they were evaluated with MRI after 6 months of follow-up. 50 patients with an MRI of their healthy ACL (Clinica Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland) and 12 patients of their contralateral healthy knee (Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria) served as the control group. To evaluate graft maturity, the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) was measured in three regions of interest (ROIs) of the proximal, mid-substance and distal ACL graft and the healthy ACL. KT-1000 findings were obtained 6 months postoperatively in the ACL reconstruction group. Statistical analysis was independently performed to outline the differences in the two groups regarding ACL intensity and the correlation between SNQ and KT-1000 values. Results There was a significant difference in the mean SNQ between the reconstructed ACL grafts and the healthy ACLs in the proximal and mid-substance regions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004). The distal region of the reconstructed ACL showed a mean SNQ similar to the native ACL (n.s). Patients with a KT-1000 between 0 and 1 mm showed a mean SNQ of 0.1; however, a poor correlation was found between the mean SNQ and KT-1000 findings, probably due to the small sample size of patients with higher laxity. Conclusion After 6 months of follow-up, hamstring tendon autografts for anatomic ACL reconstruction do not show equal MRI signal intensity compared to a healthy ACL and should therefore be considered immature or at least not completely healed even if clinical laxity measurement provides good results. However, in the case of a competitive athlete, who is clinically stable and wants to return to sports at 6 months, performing an MRI to confirm the stage of graft healing might be an option. Level of evidence Prospective, comparative study II.

SummarySubcoracoid impingement and stenosis have been described related to anterior shoulder pain and subscapularis tendon tears, but the pathogenesis and related treatment of this condition has still not been explained properly. Variability of coracoid morphology has been described and both traumatic and iatrogenic factors can modify it. Some authors referred this to a primary narrow coracohumeral distance with different threshold values defined as increased risk factor for subscapularis and antero-superior RC tear; opposite theories stated that the stenosis is secondary to an anterosuperior translation of the humeral head toward the coracoid due to degenerative changes of the rotator cuff tendons. Limited coracoplasty can be performed when related risk factors are identified; however no clear consensus arises from specific literature review and extensive clinical and instrumental examination of the patient should be performed in order to identify specific risk factors for subscapularis tendon pathology and, subsequently, tailor the proper approach.

Subcoracoid impingement and stenosis have been described related to anterior shoulder pain and subscapularis tendon tears, but the pathogenesis and related treatment of this condition has still not been explained properly. Variability of coracoid morphology has been described and both traumatic and iatrogenic factors can modify it. Some authors referred this to a primary narrow coracohumeral distance with different threshold values defined as increased risk factor for subscapularis and antero-superior RC tear; opposite theories stated that the stenosis is secondary to an anterosuperior translation of the humeral head toward the coracoid due to degenerative changes of the rotator cuff tendons. Limited coracoplasty can be performed when related risk factors are identified; however no clear consensus arises from specific literature review and extensive clinical and instrumental examination of the patient should be performed in order to identify specific risk factors for subscapularis tendon pathology and, subsequently, tailor the proper approach.

Purpose  The development of new computer-assisted navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has attracted great interest; however, the debate remains open as to the real reliability of these systems. We compared conventional TKA with last generation computer-navigated TKA to find out if navigation can reach better radiographic and clinical outcomes. Methods  Twenty patients with tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis were prospectively selected for conventional TKA ( n  = 10) or last generation computer-navigated TKA ( n  = 10). Data regarding age, gender, operated side, and previous surgery were collected. All 20 patients received the same cemented posterior-stabilized TKA. The same surgical instrumentation, including alignment and cutting guides, was used for both the techniques. A single radiologist assessed mechanical alignment and tibial slope before and after surgery. A single orthopaedic surgeon performed clinical evaluation at 1 year after the surgery. Wilcoxon's test was used to compare the outcomes of the two groups. Statistical significance was set at p  < 0.05. Results  No significant differences in mechanical axis or tibial slope was found between the two groups. The clinical outcome was equally good with both techniques. At a mean follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 13–25 months), all patients from both groups were generally satisfied with a full return to daily activities and without a significance difference between them. Conclusion  Our data showed that clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA were not improved by the use of computer-assisted instruments, and that the elevated costs of the system are not warranted. Level of Evidence  This is a Level II, randomized clinical trial.