Early pharmacological stress echocardiography followed by early discharge in case of negative test result gives similar clinical outcome and lower costs after uncomplicated myocardial infarction than clinical evaluation and delayed post-discharge symptom-limited exercise electrocardiography.

Endo-ventricular thrombosis represents a possible clinical complication of stress(takotsubo)-cardiomyopathy (SC). Depressed ventricular systolic ventricular function, localized left ventricular (LV) dyskinesis, but also an increased pro-thrombotic state induced by catecholamine surge may facilitate the occurrence of endovascular thrombosis in SC. SC, however, may also present as right ventricular (RV) dysfunction or even as biventricular ballooning. Ventricular thrombosis may therefore theoretically occur in either ventricles or both. We report the case of an 88-year old woman, with vascular dementia and depression, admitted for abdominal pain, diarrhea, and rectal bleeding. Unexpectedly, electrocardiogram showed induced QT-prolongation with diffuse negative T-waves, while echocardiogram severe LV dysfunction (ejection fraction 35%), but also RV dysfunction and biventricular thrombosis. The diagnosis was therefore biventricular SC complicated by biventricular thrombosis; LV recovered after 10 days. When SC presents with a biventricular involvement, a careful assessment of either ventricular cavities should be therefore recommended to exclude the presence of (bi)ventricular thrombosis. It remains unresolved whether biventricular SC may represent a condition at higher risk of ventricular thrombosis.

No abstract

The aim of this study was to compare cardiac catheterization (CATH) with 2D echo-Doppler (ED) in clinically evaluating the stroke volumes (SV) needed to calculate aortic and mitral regurgitant fractions (aortic and mitral SV for the ED method, thermodilution and angiographic SV for the CATH). As there is no 'gold standard' for this kind of measurement, only subjects without valvular regurgitation were considered. In these subjects, though the two SV measurements needed to calculate the regurgitant volume should have been identical, there was, in fact a difference due to the systematic and random errors of the methods. We calculated the mean value and the standard deviation of this difference in a series of patients without valvular regurgitation in order to obtain an estimate of both systematic and random errors. In 20 patients studied by ED a difference of 11.9 +/- 16.7 ml was found. In 36 patients studied by cardiac catheterization the difference was 19.6 +/- 20.1 ml. A significant systematic error was found for both ED and the invasive method; The transmitral SV tended to be larger than the aortic and the angiographic SV larger than that obtained by thermodilution. To try to determine the extent to which the random errors could be attributed to the reproducibility of the measurements, we carried out computer simulations. The SVs of 50 000 hypothetical patients were randomly generated and then attributed a random error calculated on the basis of the variability of the CATH (thermodilution 4%, angiography 10%) and the ED measurements (aortic annulus 6%, mitral annulus 18%, mitral time velocity integral 10%, aortic time velocity integral 8%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract