We present results for the comparison of six deconvolution techniques. The methods we consider are based on Fourier transforms, system identification, constrained optimization, the use of cubic spline basis functions, maximum entropy, and a genetic algorithm. We compare the performance of these techniques by applying them to simulated noisy data, in order to extract an input function when the unit impulse response is known. The simulated data are generated by convolving the known impulse response with each of five different input functions, and then adding noise of constant coefficient of variation. Each algorithm was tested on 500 data sets, and we define error measures in order to compare the performance of the different methods.
A regularization method of deconvolution constrained to non-negative values is described. The method gives smooth estimates of the input function whilst providing a feasible fit (in terms of least squares) to measurements. A description of the program CODE (constrained deconvolution) which implements the method is given. A new methodology for a pilot evaluation of deconvolution programs is also proposed. The methodology is based on synthetic data. It employs a variety of shapes of the input function, low (1%) and high (15%) values of the measurement error, and incorporates primary (accuracy) and secondary (bias) performance measures. The performance of CODE is evaluated and it is suggested that CODE provides estimates of the input function with acceptable accuracy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.