The effects of microplastics (MP) on aquatic organisms are currently the subject of intense research. Here, we provide a critical perspective on published studies of MP ingestion by aquatic biota. We summarize the available research on MP presence, behaviour and effects on aquatic organisms monitored in the field and on laboratory studies of the ecotoxicological consequences of MP ingestion. We consider MP polymer type, shape, size as well as group of organisms studied and type of effect reported. Specifically, we evaluate whether or not the available laboratory studies of MP are representative of the types of MPs found in the environment and whether or not they have reported on relevant groups or organisms. Analysis of the available data revealed that 1) despite their widespread detection in field-based studies, polypropylene, polyester and polyamide particles were under-represented in laboratory studies; 2) fibres and fragments (800-1600 μm) are the most common form of MPs reported in animals collected from the field; 3) to date, most studies have been conducted on fish; knowledge is needed about the effects of MPs on other groups of organisms, especially invertebrates. Furthermore, there are significant mismatches between the types of MP most commonly found in the environment or reported in field studies and those used in laboratory experiments. Finally, there is an overarching need to understand the mechanism of action and ecotoxicological effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of MPs on aquatic organism health.
One of the most common plastics in the marine environment is polystyrene (PS) that can be broken down to micro sized particles. Marine organisms are vulnerable to the exposure to microplastics. This study assesses the effects of PS microplastics in tissues of the clam Scrobicularia plana. Clams were exposed to 1mgL (20μm) for 14days, followed by 7days of depuration. A qualitative analysis by infrared spectroscopy in diffuse reflectance mode period detected the presence of microplastics in clam tissues upon exposure, which were not eliminated after depuration. The effects of microplastics were assessed by a battery of biomarkers and results revealed that microplastics induce effects on antioxidant capacity, DNA damage, neurotoxicity and oxidative damage. S. plana is a significant target to assess the environmental risk of PS microplastics.
Microplastic contamination of the
marine environment is widespread,
but the extent to which the marine food web is contaminated is not
yet known. The aims of this study were to go beyond visual identification
techniques and develop and apply a simple seafood sample cleanup,
extraction, and quantitative analysis method using pyrolysis gas chromatography
mass spectrometry to improve the detection of plastic contamination.
This method allows the identification and quantification of polystyrene,
polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, and poly(methyl methacrylate)
in the edible portion of five different seafood organisms: oysters,
prawns, squid, crabs, and sardines. Polyvinyl chloride was detected
in all samples and polyethylene at the highest total concentration
of between 0.04 and 2.4 mg g–1 of tissue. Sardines
contained the highest total plastic mass concentration (0.3 mg g–1 tissue) and squid the lowest (0.04 mg g–1 tissue). Our findings show that the total concentration of plastics
is highly variable among species and that microplastic concentration
differs between organisms of the same species. The sources of microplastic
exposure, such as packaging and handling with consequent transference
and adherence to the tissues, are discussed. This method is a major
development in the standardization of plastic quantification techniques
used in seafood.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.