Nowadays, there is an important controversy about coronavirus air transmission. The aim of this study was to determine aerosol transmission from patients with coronavirus infection using “COVID-19 traps” that included different untouched surfaces within them. 42 swab samples of 6 different surfaces placed in the rooms of 6 patients with a positive diagnostic of COVID-19 were analyzed with RT-PCR technique to evaluate the presence of the virus and its stability. Samples were collected at 24, 48 and 72 h. Patients were in an intensive care unit (ICU) and in a COVID-19 ward unit (CWU) at a Spanish referral hospital. None of the samples placed in the ICU unit were positive for COVID-19. However, two surfaces, placed in a CWU room with a patient that required the use of respiratory assistance were positive for coronavirus at 72 h. Surfaces could not be touched by patients or health workers, so viral spreading was unequivocally produced by air transmission. Thus, fomites should be considered as a possible mode of transmission of coronavirus and frequent disinfection of surfaces should be taken into account. Our results, although preliminary, point the importance of SARS-CoV-2 virus air transmission indoors and may shed some light in this debate.

Background Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an uncommon form of chronic pancreatitis. Whilst being corticosteroid responsive, AIP often masquerades radiologically as pancreatic neoplasia. Our aim is to appraise demographic, radiological and histological features in our cohort in order to differentiate AIP from pancreatic malignancy. Methods Clinical, biochemical, histological and radiological details of all AIP patients 1997-2016 were analysed. The initial imaging was re-reviewed according to international guidelines by three blinded independent radiologists to evaluate features associated with autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Results There were a total of 45 patients: 25 in type 1 (55.5%), 14 type 2 (31.1%) and 6 AIP otherwise not specified (13.3%). The median (IQR) age was 57 (51-70) years. Thirty patients (66.6%) were male. Twenty-six patients (57.8%) had resection for suspected malignancy and one for symptomatic chronic pancreatitis. Three had histologically proven malignancy with concurrent AIP. Two patients died from recurrent pancreatic cancer following resection. Multidisciplinary team review based on radiology and clinical history dictated management. Resected patients (vs. non-resected group) were older (64 vs. 53, p = 0.003) and more frequently had co-existing autoimmune pathologies (22.2 vs. 55.6%, p = 0.022). Resected patients also presented with less classical radiological features of AIP, which are halo sign (0/25 vs. 3/17, p = 0.029) and loss of pancreatic clefts (18/25 vs. 17/17, p = 0.017). There were no differences in demographic features other than age. Conclusion Despite international guidelines for diagnosing AIP, differentiation from pancreatic cancer remains challenging. Resection remains an important treatment option in suspected cancer or where conservative treatment fails.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract