Study Objectives: First, to determine whether the 3-item Observation and Interview-based Diurnal Sleepiness Inventory (ODSI) measures the degree of excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with suspected narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). Second, to assess the correlation between the ODSI and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) as well as objective polysomnographic measurements. Third, to test the accuracy of the ODSI to detect narcolepsy or IH (narcolepsy/IH) compared with the ESS. Methods: A total of 181 patients complaining of excessive daytime sleepiness filled in the ESS and the ODSI and underwent measurements including actigraphy, full-night polysomnography, Multiple Sleep Latency Test, and 24-hour bedrest sleep recording. Results: Narcolepsy or IH was diagnosed in 76 patients. The ODSI found excessive daytime sleepiness in 92.3% of all patients and in 98.7% of those diagnosed with narcolepsy/IH. In the whole population, the ODSI was significantly positively correlated with the ESS (R = .547; 95% confidence interval: .436, .642; P <.001) and weakly with 24-hour total sleep time on bedrest recording (R = .208; 95% confidence interval: .056, .350; P =.047) but not with the Multiple Sleep Latency Test. The ODSI offered a higher negative (92.9%) and positive (44.9%) predictive value to detect narcolepsy/IH than did the ESS (66.7% and 43.3%, respectively). In the IH group, the ODSI's third-item score (daily sleepiness duration) was significantly higher in patients with than without increased 24-hour total sleep time (P = .023). Conclusions:The ODSI is a brief, simple first-line questionnaire that explores both intensity and duration of daytime sleepiness and offers a high sensitivity to detect narcolepsy and IH.

The interpretation of the Maintenance Wakefulness Test (MWT) relies on sleep onset detection. However, microsleeps (MSs), i.e., brief periods of sleep intrusion during wakefulness, may occur before sleep onset. We assessed the prevalence of MSs during the MWT and their contribution to the diagnosis of residual sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or hypersomnia. The MWT of 98 patients (89 OSA, 82.6% male) were analyzed for MS scoring. Polysomnography parameters and clinical data were collected. The diagnostic value for detecting sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale > 10) of sleep onset latency (SOL) and of the first MS latency (MSL) was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC, 95% CI). At least one MS was observed in 62.2% of patients. MSL was positively correlated with SOL (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) but not with subjective scales, clinical variables, or polysomnography parameters. The use of SOL or MSL did not influence the diagnostic performance of the MWT for subjective sleepiness assessment (AUC = 0.66 95% CI (0.56, 0.77) versus 0.63 95% CI (0.51, 0.74)). MSs are frequent during MWTs performed in patients treated for sleep disorders, even in the absence of subjective sleepiness, and may represent physiological markers of the wake-to-sleep transition.

SummaryREM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is common in narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). Abnormalities in the reward system have been observed in NT1, possibly related to impaired orexin projections towards the mesolimbic reward system, but also in RBD when associated with Parkinson's disease. Our study aimed to explore the psychobehavioural profile of NT1 patients with and without RBD compared with healthy controls (HC). Forty patients with NT1 were compared with 20 sex‐ and age‐matched HC. All patients with NT1 underwent a video‐polysomnography including a measure of REM sleep without atonia (RSWA). The following neuropsychobehavioural variables were assessed: apathy, impulsivity, depression, cognition, subjective and objective attention, sensation‐seeking, and behavioural addictions. The patient population included 22 patients with NT1‐RBD and 18 patients with NT1‐noRBD. Compared with the healthy controls, patients with NT1 had higher scores of apathy, impulsivity, and depression; a lower score on global cognition, and poorer self‐perceived attention. No differences were found between patients with NT1 with and without RBD in all neuropsychological variables, except for impaired objective attention in patients with NT1‐RBD. In patients with NT1, a positive correlation was observed between RSWA and both apathy and impulsivity subscale. Moreover, in patients with NT1‐RBD, RSWA was positively correlated with depression. Patients with NT1 showed higher depression, apathy, and impulsivity compared with controls. These measures correlate with the severity of RSWA, suggesting a transdiagnostic association between RBD and abnormalities of the reward system at least for patients with NT1.