International audienceTwo experiments examined the development of flexibility of categorization in children aged from 3 to 5, using a picture-matching task. During a pre-test, spontaneous matches were observed. Children were next presented with a scene aimed at inducing an alternative match. Finally, they were given a post-test identical to the pre-test to assess whether they would maintain their initial choice. Both experiments showed that preschoolers were able to produce different types of categorization choices. In Experiment 1, children had to choose between a thematic and a taxonomic option. Five-year-olds; showed flexibility and changed their mode of response more often in the presence of the scenes (experimental group) than in their absence (control group). In contrast, 3-year-olds' responses seemed to reflect spontaneous variability since their switches were not related to contextual information. In Experiment 2, two more choice options were added. Three-year-olds' data replicated the findings of Experiment 1. However, a majority of 4-year-olds were consistent on the thematic mode of response and adapted their responses to the scenes only to a limited extent. Overall, the data suggest a developmental path from spontaneous variability to flexibility, via a predominance of one mode of response
This research explored the development of children's use of multiple conceptual organizations (thematic, taxonomic) in sorting sets of pictures. Experiment 1 revealed that between 5 and 9 years, two forms of categorical flexibility can be distinguished: Response and conceptual flexibility. It appeared that children's multiple sorts do not necessarily reflect the use of different conceptual organizations. Such lag was mainly due to a difficulty of access to taxonomic representations, specifically in the younger age groups. Therefore, Experiment 2 investigated the development of taxonomic representations using an original approach requiring participants to decide whether new items could be included into an existing taxonomic sort. This approach showed that taxonomic representations were only gradually differentiated from thematic-and perceptual ones over the 5 to 10 years period. The discussion raises new hypotheses about the interaction between developing executive control (specifically, increasing resistance to interference of irrelevant information) and increasing conceptual knowledge in accounting for the development of conceptual flexibility. Categorical flexibility in children: Distinguishing response flexibility from conceptual flexibility The protracted development of taxonomic representations Categorization is considered as a fundamental component of cognition and as a highly powerful tool to organize the otherwise chaotic world with limited processing capacities; it is often restricted to taxonomic categorization. Yet, other forms (perceptual or thematic) of categorization do exist and adaptive categorization can imply switching between these different forms depending on one's current goal. A ball has to be considered as a round thing if the point is to pack everything before moving to a new house, but as a thing that "goes with" a tee shirt and sport shoes (thematic grouping) if the goal is to play a football game (Barsalou, 1983). Although, recent empirical research (see below) suggests that early on, children can sort objects on a thematic or taxonomic basis, little is known about the development of categorical flexibility per se ,i.e. the ability to switch between different categorical groupings of the same set of elements. Moreover, the extent to which switching between categorical responses (i.e. sorts) reflects the actual activation of diverse types of categorical representations is an entirely open question. According to recent empirical studies, several ways of categorizing objects are available from the preschool period and even in infancy (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.