Objective To improve distressing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that persisted in rheumatoid arthritis patients with clinically controlled inflammation (controlled RA). Methods In a pragmatic pilot study, we offered Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), a group intervention to controlled RA patients who had high (≥16) Centre for Evaluation Studies—Depression (CES-D) scores and/or Patient General Assessment of disease activity (PGA) at least 2/10 larger than Evaluator General Assessment (EGA) (PGA-EGA: Delta). Evaluations before, 6, and 12 months after MBSR included CES-D, PGA, Modified-HAQ, SDAI, anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder 7; GAD-7), coping strategies (Coping with Health Injuries and Problems; CHIP), sleep disturbance, and pain. Facilitators and obstacles of recruitment and participation were identified. A subset of patients was interviewed for qualitative analysis of their experience. Results Out of 306 screened patients, 65 were referred, 39 (60%) agreed, and 28 (43%) completed MBSR. Anticipated burden, timing, and frequency of group meetings, commuting issues, age extremes, and comorbidities were barriers to participation. Up to 12 months after MBSR, anxiety, depression, emotion-oriented coping, sleep, and function significantly improved. Yet, no significant impact was observed on pain, PGA, Delta, or SDAI. The interviews revealed that benefits including integration of effective coping strategies were maintained. Conclusion We addressed MBSR feasibility issues and selection of outcomes in controlled RA patients with distressing PROs. For patients who chose to participate in MBSR lasting benefits were evident for anxiety, depression, sleep, and function. Larger studies are required to evaluate weaker impact of MBSR on RA-related pain and PGA. Lay summary What does this mean for patients? Current treatments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aim to reduce inflammation. Physicians assume that control of inflammation will improve patient well-being. While this is often the case, up to 1 in 5 patients with controlled inflammation still report high levels of pain, depressive and anxious symptoms, functional limitations, sleep problems, and disease severity. We offered at no cost to these patients a standardized 8-session group Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program when they presented for regular follow up. Out of 65 eligible patients, 39 consented, and 28 participated. Anticipated burden, especially frequency and timing of group meetings, commuting issues, age, and comorbidities were the most frequent barriers to participation. Up to 12 months after MBSR completion, anxiety, depression, sleep, and function significantly improved. Patient interviews revealed that the previously mentioned benefits were maintained by the integration of effective coping strategies. However, pain levels and patient perception of disease activity were not changed. Patients with controlled RA need be informed that MBSR can induce lasting improvements in persistent distressing symptoms associated with disease. Knowing about the durable positive effects of MBSR might influence patients to overcome barriers to participation. Additional interventions may be needed to lower pain levels and perceived disease activity.
Background:Despite available highly effective pharmacological treatments, up to 30% of current rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients remain in quasi-remission, where inflammation is controlled but patients still report unacceptable levels of negative impact of RA (high Patient Global Assessment (PGA) on a 0-10 visual analog scale). PGA levels correlated with depressive symptoms assessed by Center for Epidemiologic Studies- Depression (CES-D) scores. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is relatively inexpensive and reduces both anxiety and depression in several conditions.Objectives:To complete a feasibility and acceptability study paving the way for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of MBSR to improve depressive symptoms and clinical outcomes in RA patients in quasi-remission.Methods:A standardized 8-week MBSR program in adults with controlled inflammatory disease (stable SJC ≤ 2/66 and normal CRP; stable treatments) but high CES-D scores (2 groups), high CES-D or anxiety scores (1 group), or PGA higher than Physician Evaluation of Disease Activity (EVA) by ≥2 (1 group). Feasibility was documented using process indicators. Outcomes were measured at baseline and 6 months after the end of MBSR. Disease activity scores (SDAI) and questionnaires on depressive symptoms (CES-D), HAQ, sleep (VAS), fatigue and pain (SF-36), anxiety (GAD-7), PGA were collected. Qualitative interviews based on a theoretical framework of acceptability were conducted following the post-MBSR evaluation.Results:We report on the first 21 patients (mean age 59, 91% females) having completed their 6-month follow up evaluation. Factors leading to higher recruitment rates were 1) using pragmatic scores to identify eligible patients (e.g. EVA and PGA), 2) no formal clinical evaluation of mental health and no emphasis on depression in the recruitment material.MBSR had a highly significant positive impact on depressive symptoms (p=0.003) and anxiety (p=0.025) (Figure), and positive impact on quality of sleep and HAQ. No change in SDAI or joint counts was noted.During a qualitative interview of 13 participants, most reported that MBSR helped them control their reactions to daily stressful situations. Perceptions were almost uniformly positive towards MBSR, and most appeared to have integrated some part of it in their daily life. No side effects were reported.Conclusion:Although recruitment was challenging, a MBSR trial in RA patients in quasi-remission was found acceptable and feasible. Positive impacts on mood and on clinical outcomes were observed. Anxiety and depression scores appear the most sensitive to change and are recommended as the primary outcome for an eventual RCT. MBSR added to conventional treatments might help empower RA patients towards self-management.Acknowledgments:Grant support from Canadian Initiative for Outcomes in Rheumatology cAre (CIORA)Disclosure of Interests:Marie-Claude Beaulieu: None declared, Isabelle Gaboury: None declared, Nathalie Carrier: None declared, Patricia Dobkin: None declared, France Gervais: None declared, Françoise Gendron: None declared, Pasquale Roberge: None declared, Pierre Dagenais: None declared, Sophie Roux: None declared, Gilles Boire Grant/research support from: Merck Canada (Registry of biologices, Improvement of comorbidity surveillance)Amgen Canada (CATCH, clinical nurse)Abbvie (CATCH, clinical nurse)Pfizer (CATCH, Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse)Hoffman-LaRoche (CATCH)UCB Canada (CATCH, Clinical nurse)BMS (CATCH, Clinical nurse, Observational Study Protocol IM101664. SEROPOSITIVITY IN A LARGE CANADIAN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT)Janssen (CATCH)Celgene (Clinical nurse)Eli Lilly (Registry of biologics, Clinical nurse), Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Merck, BMS, Pfizer
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.