Kidney toxicity accounts for a significant percentage of morbidity and drug candidate failure. Serum creatinine (SCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) have been used to monitor kidney dysfunction for over a century but these markers are insensitive and non-specific. In multi-site preclinical rat toxicology studies the diagnostic performance of urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1) was compared to traditional biomarkers as predictors of kidney tubular histopathologic changes, currently considered the “gold standard” of nephrotoxicity. In multiple models of kidney injury, urinary Kim-1 significantly outperformed SCr and BUN. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for Kim-1 was between 0.91 and 0.99 as compared to 0.79 to 0.9 for BUN and 0.73 to 0.85 for SCr. Thus urinary Kim-1 is the first injury biomarker of kidney toxicity qualified by the FDA and EMEA and is expected to significantly improve kidney safety monitoring.
These results demonstrate that tissue-specific miRNAs may serve as diagnostically sensitive plasma biomarkers of tissue injury.
The first formal qualification of safety biomarkers for regulatory decision making marks a milestone in the application of biomarkers to drug development. Following submission of drug toxicity studies and analyses of biomarker performance to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) by the Predictive Safety Testing Consortium's (PSTC) Nephrotoxicity Working Group, seven renal safety biomarkers have been qualified for limited use in nonclinical and clinical drug development to help guide safety assessments. This was a pilot process, and the experience gained will both facilitate better understanding of how the qualification process will probably evolve and clarify the minimal requirements necessary to evaluate the performance of biomarkers of organ injury within specific contexts.
The NMDA receptor has been widely investigated in recent years as a target for the pharmacological management of seizures, pain and a variety of neurological disorders. Its role in normal central nervous system (CNS) activity and development, as well as in the development of CNS abnormalities and neurodegeneration has also been of interest. The NMDA receptor is one of three pharmacologically distinct subtypes of ionotropic receptor channels that are sensitive to the endogenous excitatory amino acid, L-glutamate. The ontogeny of the NMDA receptor, a multiple tetrameric and heteromeric channel complex with at least six known subunits, is controlled by three gene families and varies in developmental profile with species and regional brain area. NMDA receptors play a role in excitatory synaptic transmission, in the activity-dependent synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory, and in pre- and postnatal CNS development, including brain cell differentiation, axonal growth and degeneration of unused neurons. The results of recent studies suggest that sustained alteration of NMDA receptor activation during critical periods of development may have deleterious effects on normal CNS development and function. Neonatal rats administered the NMDA receptor antagonists 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (AP5) and MK-801 during the first two weeks of life develop abnormal axonal arborization in the retinal connections to the superior colliculus, interfering with normal visual responses. Results from monkey studies suggest that chronic developmental exposure to high doses of a NMDA antagonist, remacemide, has pronounced and long-lasting effects on learning. Recent findings indicate that if NMDA receptors are blocked during a specific period in neonatal life (first two weeks postnatally in the rat), massive apoptotic neurodegeneration results, due not to excitotoxic overstimulation of neurons but to deprivation of stimulation. These observations require further laboratory evidence and support in order to establish their relevance to drug-induced human neurodevelopmental concerns. It is necessary to investigate the relevance of these findings in other animal species in addition to the rat, most notably, nonhuman primates, where neuronal cytoarchitecture and development are significantly different than the rodent but more like the human.
This study, designed and conducted as part of the International Life Sciences Institute working group on the Application of Genomics and Proteomics, examined the changes in the expression profile of genes associated with the administration of three different nephrotoxicants--cisplatin, gentamicin, and puromycin--to assess the usefulness of microarrays in the understanding of mechanism(s) of nephrotoxicity. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with daily doses of puromycin (5-20 mg/kg/day for 21 days), gentamicin (2-240 mg/kg/day for 7 days), or a single dose of cisplatin (0.1-5 mg/kg). Groups of rats were sacrificed at various times after administration of these compounds for standard clinical chemistry, urine analysis, and histological evaluation of the kidney. RNA was extracted from the kidney for microarray analysis. Principal component analysis and gene expression-based clustering of compound effects confirmed sample separation based on dose, time, and degree of renal toxicity. In addition, analysis of the profile components revealed some novel changes in the expression of genes that appeared to be associated with injury in specific portions of the nephron and reflected the mechanism of action of these various nephrotoxicants. For example, although puromycin is thought to specifically promote injury of the podocytes in the glomerulus, the changes in gene expression after chronic exposure of this compound suggested a pattern similar to the known proximal tubular nephrotoxicants cisplatin and gentamicin; this prediction was confirmed histologically. We conclude that renal gene expression profiling coupled with analysis of classical end points affords promising opportunities to reveal potential new mechanistic markers of renal toxicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.