Upon completion of the Accelerated CAT-ASVAB Project (ACAP) system, described in the previous four chapters, the first empirical study to be conducted was an evaluation of the human-machine interface and attitudes toward CAT-ASVAB. By 1986, at the time this study was conducted, thousands of recruits had taken CAT-ASVAB on the experimental system. Nearly all participants appeared to understand the computer-presented instructions well enough to proceed through the battery with a minimum of test administrator intervention. However, before CAT-ASVAB could be used operationally, concerns about the user interface needed be addressed. It was believed that the favorable results obtained in prior studies on CAT-ASVAB concerning the instructions may not generalize to the population of interest: military applicants. This concern was fueled by at least three important observations. First, the instructions for the operational ACAP system had undergone extensive revisions t o accommodate necessary changes for an operational battery. Second, everyone participating in prior studies had taken the ASVAB before (on paper-and-pencil). Because of the simi-HUMAN FACTORS IN THE CAT SYSTEM 157
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.