Introduction HIV viral load (VL) testing in resource-limited settings is often centralised, limiting access. In Myanmar, we assessed outcomes according to VL access and the VL cascade (case management after a first high VL result) before and after near point-of-care (POC) VL was introduced. Methods Routine programme data from people living with HIV (PLHIV) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) were used. We assessed the odds of getting a VL test done by year. Attrition and mortality two years after ART initiation were compared between three groups of PLHIV with different access to VL testing using Kaplan-Meier analysis. We compared VL cascades in those with a first VL result before and after near POC VL testing became available. With logistic regression, predictors of confirmed virological failure after a first high VL in the POC era were explored. Results Among 4291 PLHIV who started ART between July 2009 and June 2018, 794 (18.5%) became eligible for VL testing when it was not available, 2388 (55.7%) when centralised laboratory-based VL testing was available, and 1109 (25.8%) when near POC VL testing was available. Between 2010 and 2019, the odds of getting a VL test among those eligible increased with each year (OR: 5.21 [95% CI: 4.95–5.48]). Attrition and mortality were not different in the three groups. When comparing PLHIV with a first VL result before and after implementation of the near POC VL testing, in the latter, more had a first VL test (92% versus 15%, p<0.001), less had a first high VL result (5% versus 14%, p<0.001), and more had confirmed virological failure (67% versus 47%, p = 0.013). Having a first VL ≥5000 copies/mL after near POC implementation was associated with confirmed virological failure (adjusted OR: 2.61 [95% CI: 1.02–6.65]). Conclusion Near POC VL testing enabled rapid increase of VL coverage and a well-managed VL cascade in Myanmar.
Introduction: HIV viral load testing in resource-limited settings is often centralized, limiting access. Near point-of-care (POC) viral load testing was introduced in Myanmar in 2017. We assessed its uptake and utilization. Methods : Routine program data from three HIV clinics of Medical Action Myanmar were used. Annual viral load uptake was cross-sectionally analysed in people living with HIV (PLHIV) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiated between July 2009-June 2019. Attrition at two years was assessed between PLHIV with different access to viral load testing with Kaplan-Meier analysis. For those eligible for a first viral load when near POC viral load became available, a viral load cascade was constructed. We used logistic regression to explore predictors of confirmed virological failure after a first high viral load. Results: Among 5271 PLHIV who started ART between July 2009-December 2019, annual viral load uptake increased significantly after near POC was introduced. Attrition in the first two years after ART initiation was not different among those eligible for a first viral load before viral load was available, after centralized laboratory-based viral load, and after near POC viral load introduction. After introduction of near POC viral load, 92% (2945/3205) of eligible PLHIV received a first viral load, a median of 2.8 years (IQR: 1.4-4.4) after initiation. The delay was 3.7 years (IQR: 2.8-5.1) and 0.9 years (IQR: 0.6-1.4) in those becoming eligible before and after near POC viral load was available, respectively. Among those with a first viral load, 95% (2796/2945) were <=1000 copies/ml. Eighty-four % (125/149) of those with a viral load >1000 copies/ml received enhanced adherence counselling and a follow up viral load, a median of 119 days (IQR: 95-167) after the first viral load. Virological failure was confirmed in 67% (84/125), and 82% (69/84) of them were switched to second-line ART. Nine-three % (64/69) among those switched were alive on ART at end of follow-up. Having a first viral load of >=5000 copies/ml was associated with confirmed virological failure. Conclusion: Near POC viral load testing enabled rapid scale-up of viral load testing in Myanmar. PLHIV with a high viral load were adequately managed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.