Cartographic generalization is a problem, which poses interesting challenges to automation. Whereas plenty of algorithms have been developed for the different sub-problems of generalization (e.g., simplification, displacement, aggregation), there are still cases, which are not generalized adequately or in a satisfactory way. The main problem is the interplay between different operators. In those cases the human operator is the benchmark, who is able to design an aesthetic and correct representation of the physical reality. Deep learning methods have shown tremendous success for interpretation problems for which algorithmic methods have deficits. A prominent example is the classification and interpretation of images, where deep learning approaches outperform traditional computer vision methods. In both domains-computer vision and cartography-humans are able to produce good solutions. A prerequisite for the application of deep learning is the availability of many representative training examples for the situation to be learned. As this is given in cartography (there are many existing map series), the idea in this paper is to employ deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for cartographic generalizations tasks, especially for the task of building generalization. Three network architectures, namely U-net, residual U-net and generative adversarial network (GAN), are evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively in this paper. They are compared based on their performance on this task at target map scales 1:10,000, 1:15,000 and 1:25,000, respectively. The results indicate that deep learning models can successfully learn cartographic generalization operations in one single model in an implicit way. The residual U-net outperforms the others and achieved the best generalization performance.
<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Cartographic generalization is a problem, which poses interesting challenges to automation. Whereas plenty of algorithms have been developed for the different sub-problems of generalization (e.g. simplification, displacement, aggregation), there are still cases, which are not generalized adequately or in a satisfactory way. The main problem is the interplay between different operators. In those cases the benchmark is the human operator, who is able to design an aesthetic and correct representation of the physical reality.</p><p>Deep Learning methods have shown tremendous success for interpretation problems for which algorithmic methods have deficits. A prominent example is the classification and interpretation of images, where deep learning approaches outperform the traditional computer vision methods. In both domains &ndash; computer vision and cartography &ndash; humans are able to produce a solution; a prerequisite for this is, that there is the possibility to generate many training examples for the different cases. Thus, the idea in this paper is to employ Deep Learning for cartographic generalizations tasks, especially for the task of building generalization. An advantage of this task is the fact that many training data sets are available from given map series. The approach is a first attempt using an existing network.</p><p>In the paper, the details of the implementation will be reported, together with an in depth analysis of the results. An outlook on future work will be given.</p>
Abstract. Automated recognition of terrain structures is a major research problem in many application areas. These structures can be investigated in raster products such as Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) generated from Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data. Following the success of deep learning and computer vision techniques on color images, researchers have focused on the application of such techniques in their respective fields. One example is detection of structures in DEM data. DEM data can be used to train deep learning models, but recently, Du et al. (2019) proposed a multi-modal deep learning approach (hereafter referred to as MM) proving that combination of geomorphological information help improve the performance of deep learning models. They reported that combining DEM, slope, and RGB-shaded relief gives the best result among other combinations consisting of curvature, flow accumulation, topographic wetness index, and grey-shaded relief. In this work, we approve and build on top of this approach. First, we use MM and show that combinations of other information such as sky view factors, (simple) local relief models, openness, and local dominance improve model performance even further. Secondly, based on the recently proposed HR-Net (Sun et al., 2019), we build a tinier, Multi-Modal High Resolution network called MM-HR, that outperforms MM. MM-HR learns with fewer parameters (4 millions), and gives an accuracy of 84:2 percent on ZISM50m data compared to 79:2 percent accuracy by MM which learns with more parameters (11 millions). On the dataset of archaeological mining structures from Harz, the top accuracy by MM-HR is 91:7 percent compared to 90:2 by MM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.