In patients at high risk of herniation recurrence after lumbar microdiscectomy, annular closure with a bone-anchored implant lowers the risk of symptomatic recurrence and reoperation. Additional study to determine outcomes beyond 2 years with a bone-anchored annular closure device is warranted.

No abstract

Fentanyl, norfentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil, remifentanil and 3-methylfentanyl are potent, short-acting, synthetic narcotic analgesics that are not revealed in standard opiate immunoassays. In this article, a fully validated analytical method for the determination of these fentanyl-type compounds in plasma and urine is presented, consisting of a liquid-liquid extraction followed by a LC-MS/MS analysis using electrospray ionisation in the positive ionisation mode. Fentanyl-d(5) and norfentanyl-d(5) were used as internal standards. The lower LOQ in plasma and urine was 0.1 ng/mL for fentanyl, norfentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and 3-methylfentanyl, and 0.2 ng/mL for sufentanil. The method proved linear over a concentration range of 0.2-50 ng/mL for sufentanil and 0.1-50 ng/mL for all other analytes, with correlation coefficients of 0.998 or better. The analytical procedure showed excellent selectivity and precision (all CVs below 15%) for all analytes. Accuracy was good, except for sufentanil, where deviations of more than 15% from nominal concentrations were observed. No matrix effects were observed, and stability of stock and internal standard solutions was within acceptability limits.

IntroductionLumbar discectomy patients with large annular defects are at a high risk for reherniation and reoperation, which could be mitigated through the use of an annular closure device (ACD). To identify the most effective treatment pathways for this high-risk population, it is critical to understand the clinical outcomes and socioeconomic costs among reoperated patients as well as the utility of ACD for minimizing reoperation risk.MethodsThis was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of an ACD. All 550 patients (both ACD treated and control) from the RCT with follow-up data through 2 years were included in this analysis (69 reoperated and 481 non-reoperated). Reoperations were defined as any revision surgery of the index level, regardless of indication. Equivalent U.S. Medicare expenditures for reoperations were estimated through cost multipliers derived from the commercially available PearlDiver database.ResultsA significantly greater number of control patients (45/278; 16%) compared to ACD patients (24/272; 9%) underwent a revision surgery at the index level within 2 years of followup (p=0.01). At 2 years of follow-up, the reoperated patients had significantly worse Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual analog scale for leg and back pain scores compared to their non-reoperated counterparts (p<0.0001). The total estimated direct medical costs for reoperation were US $952,348 ($13,802 per reoperated patient), with control patients accounting for the majority of this cost burden ($565,188; 59%).ConclusionPost-discectomy reoperation is associated with significantly increased patient morbidity, missed work, and direct treatment costs in a population at high risk for reherniation. Annular closure helped minimize this clinical and socioeconomic burden by reducing the incidence of reoperation by nearly 50% (16% control vs 9% ACD).

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Same-level reherniation and progressive degeneration with disc height loss are main causes of poor outcome after discectomy and may necessitate reoperation.  A novel prosthesis for anular closure was developed to address these causes.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The design of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, post-market superiority trial comparing limited lumbar discectomy augmented with this device (intervention group) with limited lumbar discectomy alone (control group) is presented.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Patients with single-level (L1-S1) posterior or posterolateral disc herniation and radiologic confirmation of neural compression for whom at least six weeks of conservative treatment has failed are eligible.  Patients must have posterior disc height ≥5 mm at index level and baseline Oswestry and VAS leg pain scores of ≥40/100.  Intraoperatively, subjects meeting anular defect size criteria post-discectomy (4-6 mm tall and 6-10 mm wide) will be randomized to study groups in a 1:1 ratio using centralized, web-based software. A Bayesian statistical approach will be used to enroll 400 to 800 subjects who will be followed for at least 24 months.  Two co-primary endpoints will be assessed at 24 months: 1) a composite of leg pain, clinical function, disc height maintenance, and absence of reherniation, reoperation, and device failure; and 2) absence of reherniation based upon independent radiologic analysis.  </p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This type of analysis is becoming increasingly important as governments and health insurers continue to be pressured to spend limited healthcare funding wisely.