Ionóforos são antibióticos amplamente utilizados nas composições de dietas de ruminantes, com o objetivo de diminuir o consumo de matéria seca e aumentar a eficiência alimentar, dificultando o desenvolvimento da acidose ruminal e gerando melhor aproveitamento de nutrientes, por ação principalmente sobre as bactérias gram- positivas. Entretanto, essa utilização é uma preocupação pelo surgimento de resistência bacteriana aos antibióticos, que reflete na medicina humana. Meio a situação, surgem estudos com os óleos essenciais (OEs) que buscam a substituição dos antibióticos, promovendo efeitos similares, devido suas propriedades antimicrobianas, similares às funções dos ionóforos. O objetivo do trabalho foi analisar os resultados da comparação entre os dois aditivos na dieta. O efeito dos OEs variam de acordo com sua fonte, podendo causar diferentes impactos no consumo de alimentos pelo animal, porém estudos realizados concluíram que independente da dosagem e da fonte os óleos provocam resultado positivo no ganho médio diário (GMD), levando a eficiência alimentar (EA) a não sofrer impactos pelo aumento do consumo de matéria seca (CMS). Colocando- se os OEs em substituição à monensina, a observação do aumento do CMS se mantém, porém não são observadas alterações no GMD, também é notado um aumento na incidência de abcessos hepáticos o que gera a necessidade de novos estudos para compreensão. O fornecimento dos OEs na alimentação terá repercussão similar a monensina (principal ionóforo utilizado), porém com um maior CMS.

No abstract

This study evaluated the effects of different moist orange pulp (MOP) inclusions in corn grain rehydration for silage production as a strategy to store and use MOP and whether these inclusions result in adequate fermentation and aerobic stability (AE) and acceptable losses. Ground corn grain and MOP were weighed separately and mixed to obtain MOP inclusions of 21%, 34%, or 42%. The control treatment was obtained with corn rehydrated with distilled water and MOP inclusion of 0%, with five laboratory silos (15‐L buckets) per treatment. Acid detergent fiber, acid detergent insoluble protein, acid detergent lignin, lactic acid, acetic acid, and ethanol contents increased linearly with increasing MOP inclusion, whereas starch, in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility and butyric acid contents and pH decreased linearly. NH3‐N/TN content reduced quadratically and was minimal with 8.34 g/kg DM at 14% MOP inclusion. Total DM losses increased quadratically with maximal losses of 4.26% DM at 25% MOP inclusion. AE reduced by 2.8 h for each 1% increase in MOP inclusion. Rehydration of corn grain with MOP results in an adequate fermentation process. The inclusion of 34% MOP was the best because DM losses were lower and AE was not drastically reduced.

The effects of different additives on farm‐scale silage quality and beef cattle performance are inconsistent. This study aimed to carry out a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the efficacy of chemical and microbial additives to silage on beef cattle performance. Systematic searches were performed using databases and scientific journals, and 42 articles were selected. Data for all variables were grouped into subgroups according to the additive type. For dry matter intake and average daily gain, the data were also grouped by forage type due to greater comparison numbers. The treatment mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (p < 0.05) were analysed using a random‐effects model. The use of homo‐ and heterofermentative microbial inoculant mixtures and chemical additives (Ch) increased the average daily gain of beef cattle fed maize/sorghum silage. Homofermentative microbial inoculant (Ho), Ch, and a mixture of microbial inoculant and chemical additives also increased the average daily gain of beef cattle fed temperate grasses. Only Ch increased dry matter intake. Ch increased feed efficiency, and Ch and Ho increased carcass weight. The evaluated additives improved the silage fermentation process mainly via pH and ammonia nitrogen reduction. Overall, this meta‐analysis demonstrated that silage additives improved the ensiling process and beef cattle performance, with better results with Ch use. Due to the aerobic stability and microbiological profile analyses being carried out more in laboratory‐scale silos, more studies are needed to determine these silage parameters after opening the silo at the farm scale.

This study aimed to evaluate the silage quality, ingestive behaviour, and sheep energy partition fed corn and sorghum silages, with or without inoculation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri. Whole plants of one dent corn hybrid (DCS), one flint corn hybrid (FCS), and one forage sorghum hybrid (SS) were ensiled with or without an inoculant containing L. plantarum and L. buchneri (4 × 105 CFU g−1), totalling six treatments (3 × 2 factorial scheme). The treatments were ensiled in metal drums with 200 L capacity. The lactic acid concentrations in the inoculated FCS and DCS were higher by 13.4% and 12.8%, respectively, than those in the non‐inoculated plants. In contrast, the lactic acid concentration in the inoculated SS was 23.1% lower than that in the non‐inoculated SS. Furthermore, there were differences in pH and acetic acid concentrations only in SS, which were 2.3% and 45.2% higher, respectively, in inoculated silage than in non‐inoculated silage. In inoculated DCS and SS, propionic acid concentrations were 1.7 times higher (for both silages), and 1‐propanol was 3.7 and 1.8 times higher compared than those in non‐inoculated silages. There was a main effect of the inoculant on 1,2‐propanediol concentrations, which were 37.5% higher in inoculated silages than in non‐inoculated silages. However, ingestive behaviour, heat and methane production, and silage net energy concentrations were not affected by inoculant use. Fermentative modifications caused by inoculation with L. plantarum and L. buchneri in whole plant corn or sorghum silage did not modify sheep energy partition.