The recognition of the presence, location, and properties of unusual accessory pathways for atrioventricular conduction is an exciting, but frequently a difficult, challenge for the clinical cardiac arrhythmologist. In this third part of our series of reviews, we discuss the different steps required to come to the correct diagnosis and management decision in patients with nodofascicular, nodoventricular, and fasciculo‐ventricular pathways. We also discuss the concealed accessory atrioventricular pathways with the properties of decremental retrograde conduction that are associated with the so‐called permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia. Careful analysis of the 12‐lead electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm and tachycardias should always precede the investigation in the catheterization room. When using programmed electrical stimulation of the heart from different intracardiac locations, combined with activation mapping, it should be possible to localize both the proximal and distal ends of the accessory connections. This, in turn, should then permit the determination of their electrophysiologic properties, providing the answer to the question “are they incorporated in a tachycardia circuit?”. It is this information that is essential for decision‐making with regard to the need for catheter ablation, and if necessary, its appropriate site.

Recognition of the presence, location, and properties of unusual accessory pathways for atrioventricular conduction is an exciting, frequently difficult, challenge for the clinical cardiac arrhythmologist. In this second part of our series of reviews relative to this topic, we discuss the steps required to achieve the correct diagnosis and appropriate management in patients with the so‐called “Mahaim” variants of pre‐excitation. We indicate that, nowadays, it is recognized that these abnormal rhythms are manifest because of the presence of atriofascicular pathways. These anatomical substrates, however, need to be distinguished from the other long and short accessory pathways which produce decremental atrioventricular conduction. The atriofascicular pathways, along with the long decrementally conducting pathways, have their atrial components located within the vestibule of the tricuspid valve. The short decremental pathways, in contrast, can originate in the vestibules of either the mitral or tricuspid valves. As a starting point, careful analysis of the 12‐lead electrocardiogram, taken during both sinus rhythm and tachycardias, should precede any investigation in the catheterization room. When assessing the patient in the electrophysiological laboratory, the use of programmed electrical stimulation from different intracardiac locations, combined with entrainment technique and activation mapping, should permit the establishment of the properties of the accessory pathways, and localization of its proximal and distal ends. This should provide the answer to the question “is the pathway incorporated into the circuit underlying the clinical tachycardia”. That information is essential for decision‐making with regard to need, and localization of the proper site, for catheter ablation.

The famous quotation of Winston Churchill, made in his radio broadcast of 1939 regarding Russia's next move, specifically “A riddle wrapped up in a mystery, inside an enigma,” perfectly fits the current understanding of unusual accessory atrioventricular pathways, including the variants producing ventricular pre‐excitation. It was many decades after their original descriptions that we came better to begin to understand most of their structure‐function relationships. Their mysterious pathophysiology was sometimes unveiled after invasive treatments, such as surgical ablation of the atrioventricular conduction axis instead of the accessory pathway itself. Speculations made on this basis have largely been validated by subsequent clinical experience. Most of the names suggested for description of the pathways have stood well the test of time. For some of them, however, this is not the case, with the initial names becoming confusing. In a series of reviews, we re‐visit those accessory pathways producing ventricular pre‐excitation other than classical Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome. To set the scene, in this initial review, we describe the development and anatomy of the normal atrioventricular conduction axis, along with the insulating tissues of the atrioventricular junctions. We have sought to illustrate our explanations by using virtual dissection of computerized tomographic datasets, since they retain the intact heart within the setting of the body. These images illustrate well the value of attitudinally appropriate terminology. Thereafter, we discuss the electrophysiological manifestations of the abnormal anatomical pathways which provide the potential for both accessory atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction.

Background— Epicardial mapping and ablation of accessory pathways through a subxiphoid approach can be an alternative when endocardial or epicardial transvenous mapping has failed. Methods and Results— We reviewed acute and long-term follow-up of 21 patients (14 males) referred for percutaneous epicardial accessory pathway ablation. There was a median of 2 previous failed procedures. All patients were highly symptomatic, 8 had atrial fibrillation (3 with cardiac arrest) and 13 had frequent symptomatic episodes of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Six patients (28.5%) had a successful epicardial ablation. Five patients (23.8%) underwent a successful repeated endocardial mapping, and ablation after epicardial mapping yielded no early activation site. Epicardial mapping was helpful in guiding endocardial ablation in 2 patients (9.5%), showing that the earliest activation was simultaneous at the epicardium and endocardium. Four patients (19%) underwent successful open-chest surgery after failing epicardial/endocardial ablation. Two patients (9.5%) remained controlled under antiarrhythmic drugs after unsuccessful endocardial/epicardial ablation. Two patients had a coronary sinus diverticulum and one a right atrium to right ventricle diverticulum. Three patients acquired postablation coronary sinus stenosis. There was no major complication related to pericardial access. Conclusions— Percutaneous epicardial approach is an alternative when conventional endocardial or transvenous epicardial ablation fails in the elimination of the accessory pathway. A new attempt by endocardial approach was successful in a significant number of patients. Open-chest surgery may be required in symptomatic cases refractory to endocardial–epicardial approach.