Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the proper structure for the integrated reporting of hi-tech knowledge-based organizations (KBOs); in particular, the authors evaluate the appropriateness of the concept and elements of integrated reporting for hi-tech KBOs. Design/methodology/approach The study uses an exploratory sequential mixed-method approach, including an initial qualitative case study, then an instrument development phase (Delphi), and finally, a quantitative survey. Findings The resulting analysis concluded that hi-tech KBOs have the potential to prepare a simplified, integrated report. The organization overview, governance, business model, strategies and resource allocation, performance, opportunities and risks are the content elements relevant to be included in the hi-tech KBOs annual report. However, the organization’s future outlook is not confirmed to be included. Due to liability and competitive concerns, organizations do not provide targets, forecasts, projections or even scenarios. Research limitations/implications Focus on a single country and a small sample of interviewees participated. Practical implications This paper concludes that the existing integrated reporting framework is useful for different types of organizations, but with some modifications. In addition, it analyzes how directors of Iranian hi-tech KBOs perceive and value content elements of integrated reporting. Social implications This paper suggests that the fulfillment of corporate transparency for Iranian hi-tech KBOs can be achieved by the policymaker’s support on integrated reporting. Originality/value Iran is swiftly moving toward a knowledge-based economy, and hi-tech KBOs will become the powerhouse of the economy. It is important to understand how managers of Iranian hi-tech KBOs perceive and value integrated reporting. The previous practical studies are not focused on Iranian firms and the impacts of integrated reporting on hi-tech KBOs and its implementation and effectiveness had not been studied before.

No abstract

conformité des ratings ESG, compte tenu des missions confiées aux agences, sont peu étudiées (Chatterji et al., 2016). L'étude porte sur un échantillon de 247 sociétés cotées européennes et 65 anglo-saxonnes lors des années 2009-2012. Elle évalue les différences d'approche des trois organismes. La méthodologie utilisée est l'analyse en composantes principales qui établit les corrélations entre les scores puis la régression longitudinale qui identifie les facteurs de différenciation observés.

Cet article montre le rôle joué par la gouvernance dans l'évaluation et à la mesure du capital intellectuel et de ses composantes par les analystes d'un fonds d'investissement spécialisé dans l'investissement socialement responsable ainsi que l'influence du milieu socio-économique et institutionnel dans lequel les entreprises s'insèrent. Les données examinées concernent les années 2010 à 2012 pour un échantillon de 289 sociétés cotées européennes pour la plupart de capitalisation moyenne extrait d'une population mère de plus de mille entreprises suivie par ce fonds privé.