Extracorporeal life support for severe ARDS in adults is a successful therapeutic option in those patients who do not respond to conventional mechanical ventilator strategies.

The addition of human renal tubule cell therapy to CRRT has been accomplished and demonstrates metabolic activity with systemic effects in patients with ARF and MOF. These initial clinical results are encouraging, so that a randomized, controlled Phase II clinical trial is underway to further assess the clinical safety and efficacy of this new therapeutic approach.

Background-The use of extracorporeal life support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) as a direct bridge to heart transplant in adult patients is associated with poor survival. Similarly, the use of an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to salvage patients with cardiac arrest, severe hemodynamic instability, and multiorgan failure results in poor outcome. The use of LVAD implant in patients who present with cardiogenic shock who have not been evaluated for transplantation or who have sustained a recent myocardial infarction also raises concerns. ECMO may provide reasonable short-term support to patients with severe hemodynamic instability, permit recovery of multiorgan injury, and allow time to complete a transplant evaluation before long-term circulatory support with an implantable LVAD is instituted. After acquisition of the HeartMate LVAD (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc), we began using ECMO as a bridge to an implantable LVAD and, subsequently, to transplantation in selected high-risk patients. adult patients who presented with refractory cardiogenic shock (cardiac index Ͻ2.0 L ⅐ min Ϫ1 ⅐ m Ϫ2 , with systolic blood pressure Ͻ100 mm Hg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure Ն24 mm Hg and dependent on Ն2 inotropes with or without intra-aortic balloon pump) were evaluated and accepted as candidates for mechanical assistance as a bridge to transplant. Of the 32 patients, 14 (group I) had a cardiac arrest or severe hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure Յ75 mm Hg) with evidence of multiorgan failure (defined as serum creatinine level Ͼ3 mg/dL or oliguria; international normalized ratio Ͼ1.5 or transaminases Ͼ5 times normal or total bilirubin Ͼ3 mg/dL; and needing mechanical ventilation). Group I patients were placed on ECMO support; 7 underwent subsequent LVAD implant and 1 was bridged directly to transplant. Six patients in group I survived to transplant hospitalization discharge. The remaining 18 patients (group II) underwent LVAD implant without ECMO support; 12 survived to transplant hospitalization discharge and 2 remained alive with ongoing LVAD support and awaited transplant. One-year actuarial survival from the initiation of circulatory support was 43% in group I and 75% in group II. One-year actuarial survival from the time of LVAD implant in group I, conditional on surviving ECMO, was 71% (PϭNS compared with group II). Conclusions-In appropriately selected high-risk patients, the rate of LVAD survival after initial ECMO support was not significantly different from the survival rate after LVAD support alone. An initial period of resuscitation with ECMO is an effective strategy to salvage patients with extreme hemodynamic instability and multiorgan injury. Use of LVAD resources is improved by avoiding LVAD implant in a very-high-risk cohort of patients who do not survive ECMO. (Circulation. 1999;100[suppl II]:II-206 -II-210.)

No abstract

Between May 1990 and January 1999, 100 patients (68 adult, 32 pediatric) with severe respiratory or cardiac instability were successfully transported to the University of Michigan Medical Center on extracorporeal life support. Diagnoses included adult respiratory distress syndrome (n = 78), cardiac failure (n = 7), sepsis (n = 7), asthma (n = 5), respiratory distress syndrome (of newborn) (n = 2), and airway compromise (n = 1). Of the patients, 53 were supported with venovenous bypass and 47 with venoarterial bypass. Patients were transported by ground ambulance (n = 80), helicopter (n = 15), or fixed-wing aircraft (n = 5). The median transport distance was 44 miles (range 2-790 miles), and the median transport time was 5 hours and 30 minutes (range: 1 h 33 min to 16 h 6 min). Sixty-six patients (66%) survived to discharge. One death occurred during cannulation, and two patients died before cannulation began. Complications that occurred during transport included 10 cases of electrical failure, 3 cases of circuit tubing leakage, and 1 case each of circuit rupture, membrane lung thrombosis, and membrane lung leakage. None of the complications occurring during transport had an adverse effect on outcome. We conclude that the long distance transport of patients on extracorporeal life support can be safely accomplished and is an effective option for the unstable patient with severe respiratory or cardiac failure.