The application of fuels from renewable sources ("alternative fuels") in aviation is important for the reduction of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, but may also attribute to reduced release of particles from jet engines. The present experiment describes ground-based measurements in the framework of the ECLIF (Emission and Climate Impact of Alternative Fuels) campaign using an Airbus A320 (V2527-A5 engines) burning six fuels of chemically different composition. Two reference Jet A-1 with slightly different chemical parameters were applied and further used in combination with a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic paraffinic kerosene (FT-SPK) to prepare three semi synthetic jet fuels (SSJF) of different aromatic content. In addition, one commercially available fully synthetic jet fuel (FSJF) featured the lowest aromatic content of the fuel selection. Neither the release of nitrogen oxide or carbon monoxide was significantly affected by the different fuel composition. The measured particle emission indices showed a reduction up to 50% (number) and 70% (mass) for two alternative jet fuels (FSJF, SSJF2) at low power settings in comparison to the reference fuels. The reduction is less pronounced at higher operating conditions but the release of particle number and particle mass is still significantly lower for the alternative fuels than for both reference fuels. The observed correlation between emitted particle mass and fuel aromatics is not strict. Here, the H/C ratio is a better indicator for soot emission.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The emission of soot particles from aircraft jet engines is relevant due to their impact on contrail formation and local air quality in airport areas. The reduction of particle emission may be achieved by changes in jet engine design. This, however, will only affect new aircraft. Previous studies have shown that the use of alternative jet fuels feature a co-beneficial reduction of soot emission beside an improved carbon footprint. In the present study, a CFM56-5C4 engine was operated on a test rig with three different fuel types: one reference kerosene, a catalytic hydrothermolysis jet fuel (Readijet) and an unblended alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) fuel. Due to the absence of aromatics in the ATJ fuel, ASTM jet fuel requirements are not met, but the use of this fuel led to a reduction of 70% in particle mass compared to the reference fuel. The ReadiJet fuel has higher aromatic content, lower fuel hydrogen content and, thus, an increase in particle emission was observed. For the present engine, the highest soot reductions were observed at lower power settings. In accordance to previous studies, the soot emission showed a good correlation to the hydrogen content of the fuels and the emission reduction matches the estimations of the imFOX model. In order to compare test rig studies to field studies, transient processes must be considered because they govern takeoff conditions. Four experiments with different transient thrust patterns were performed on the test rig with regular Jet A-1. If the thrust changes were not very rapid (e.g. 5 s to ~90% thrust) the results could be reproduced with a set of pseudo-stationary processes to a sufficient extend. This emphasizes the relevance of test-rig studies for real in-field measurements and local air quality studies.