Aim Much of what is known about invasion biology is based on research conducted in North America and Europe, leading to limitations and potential biases in our knowledge. We address these limitations by conducting a systematic review to assess the literature on ecological studies of two major tropical and subtropical invasive plant species, Ageratina adenophora and Chromolaena odorata. Our goals were to: (1) collect the literature on the invasion biology of these species by broadly searching five databases (one international and four regional); (2) determine limitations to the international literature available in the ISI Web of Science (WOS); (3) quantitatively summarize the scope of the invasion literature on the two species; and (4) propose future studies based on what we found.Location Global.Methods Using specific search terms, we searched the literature for A. adenophora and C. odorata in the ISI WOS, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Indian Journals, Nepal Journals Online and African Journals Online (AJOL). We extracted information on journal titles, publication years, study area locations, habitats investigated and study focus.Results We found 101 papers for A. adenophora and 61 papers for C. odorata, published from 1987 to 2015. A high percentage of the studies were conducted in China, western and southern Africa, and India. Studies from WOS most frequently focused on the mechanism of invasion, while studies from CNKI and AJOL focused on the impacts of the invader.Main conclusions Web of Science is not sufficient for generalizing about the invasion biology literature, particularly if the goal is a comprehensive assessment that includes areas other than North America, Hawaii, Europe, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand. In future systematic reviews, other databases should be used if possible, including those in languages other than English. For future research, several research areas should be studied more thoroughly for A. adenophora and C. odorata invasions, including possible multiple factors responsible for invasion, and impacts of co-occurring invasive species.
To determine the cause of the severe drought that hit five provinces (autonomous regions, municipalities) of Southwest China in 2010, the ecological water demand (EWD) of regional vegetation was explored. The key scientific question was whether the plantation of Eucalyptus and Hevea trees in this area could have led to the breaking of the regional EWD balance, thereby causing a regional drought. Therefore, major research progress and trends related to EWD of vegetation, such as characterization of vegetation water consumption from transpiration and eco-hydrological effects, were explored. Theories, methods, and practices regarding EWD of vegetation, and the correlation between regional vegetation types and droughts were evaluated. Finally, suggestions were made for specific scientific research on temporal and spatial evolution of typical artificial vegetation in Southwest China and on the relationship between EWD from regional vegetation and droughts. Thus, future research should include the following three aspects: (i) historical evolution and distribution pattern of regional artificial vegetation; (ii) water consumption from transpiration, water saving for drought prevention, and water and soil conservation of regional artificial vegetation; and (iii) the relationship between EWD of regional artificial vegetation and regional droughts. The proposed research focus is expected to provide a scientific basis for identifying the causes of regional droughts and the reasonable allocation of water resources. In addition, it will be of great importance in guiding restoration and reconstruction of regional artificial vegetation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.