Abstract-Numerical artifacts affect the reliability of computational dosimetry of human exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields. In the guidelines of the International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, a reduction factor of 3 was considered to take into account numerical uncertainties when determining the limit values for human exposure. However, the rationale for this value is unsure. The IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety has published a research agenda to resolve numerical uncertainties in low-frequency dosimetry. For this purpose, intercomparison of results computed using different methods by different research groups is important. In previous intercomparison studies for low-frequency exposures, only a few computational methods were used, and the computational scenario was limited to a uniform magnetic field exposure. This study presents an application of various numerical techniques used: different finite-element method (FEM) schemes, method of moments, and boundary-element method (BEM) variants, and, finally, by using a hybrid FEM/BEM approach. As a computational example, the induced electric field in the brain by the coil used in transcranial magnetic stimulation is investigated. Intercomparison of the computational results is presented qualitatively. Some remarks are given for the effectiveness and limitations of application of the various computational methods.
To radiate electromagnetic energy from a single point of a finite difference time domain (FDTD) grid, there are typically two general classes of electromagnetic wave sources; the soft source which consists of impressing a current, and the hard source which consists of impressing an electric field. The physical meaning of the soft source is well understood and its analytical solution is known, whereas there is no analytical solution for the hard source excitation. Nevertheless, many FDTD works utilize the hard source for its practicality. A novel aspect is that the derivation of a field radiated from the hard source towards the free space is identical to the field radiated from the soft source, provided that a certain relationship holds between the source excitations. This provides us with an analytical solution for the field radiated from the hard source. The assessment of accuracy is then considered for a wide band field radiated from a punctual source into frequency-dependent FDTD Debye media. The quantification of the deviation of the waveform observed in the FDTD space from the analytical solution is demonstrated. The numerical experiments with this quantification show that the waveform observed with the soft source excitation matches the one with the hard source excitation when the minimum wavelength to the spatial discretization ratio is greater than 10. It turns out that the soft source outperforms the hard source when the minimum wavelength relative to the spatial discretization is less than 10 in the case of lossless media. Equivalent accuracy is achievable for both lossless and lossy media even when the minimum wavelength to the spatial discretization ratio is lower than 10 due to the loss tangent which absorbs the spurious frequencies related to the numerical noise.Index Terms-Debye media, finite difference time domain (FDTD), hard source, punctual source excitation, soft source, ultrawideband (UWB).
In this paper we extend the unconditionally stable Crank-Nicolson Finite Difference Time Domain (CN-FDTD) method, to incorporate frequency-dependent media in three dimensions. A Gaussian-elimination-based direct sparse solver is used to deal with the large sparse matrix system arising from the formulation. Numerical results validate and confirm that the scheme is unconditionally stable for time steps over the Courant-Friedrich-Lewy limit of classical FDTD.
The non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) expansion method is used to quantify the uncertainty of a stochastic system. It potentially reduces the number of numerical simulations in modelling process, thus improving efficiency, whilst ensuring accuracy. However, the number of polynomial bases grows substantially with the increase of random parameters, which may render the technique ineffective due to the excessive computational resources. To address such problems, methods based on the sparse strategy such as the least angle regression (LARS) method with hyperbolic index sets can be used. This paper presents the first work to improve the accuracy of the original LARS method for uncertainty quantification (UQ). We propose an adaptive LARS method in order to quantify the uncertainty of the results from the numerical simulations with higher accuracy than the original LARS method. The proposed method outperforms the original LARS method in terms of accuracy and stability. The L2 regularisation scheme further reduces the number of input samples while maintaining the accuracy of the LARS method.Index Terms-Non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) expansion, least angle regression (LARS), uncertainty quantification (UQ), finite difference time domain (FDTD), Debye media
Abstract-The invariance of wave equations in lossless media allows the Time Reversal (TR) technique to spatio-temporally refocus back-propagated signals in a given ultrawideband imaging scenario. However, the existence of dispersion and loss in the propagation medium breaks this invariance and the resultant TR focusing exhibits frequency and propagation duration dependent degradation. We propose an algorithm based on the continuous wavelet transform that tackles this degradation to improve focusing resolution under such conditions. The developed algorithm has been successfully applied to the scenario for localization of lung cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.