Our results reveal that mel-18 gene mutations are exceedingly rare in human breast cancers, and a reduction of mel-18 expression in human breast cancer cell lines would support a role for mel-18 haploinsufficiency in breast carcinogenesis.
10660 Background: The goal of chemotherapy (CT) for EBC is to achieve a high pathologic complete response (CR) leading to an increase in the rate of breast conserving surgery (BCS). ET is one of the most active CT regimens for metastatic breast cancer. The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate clinical response Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were newly diagnosed with EBC and had large primary tumors (stage II-III, > 3 cm). Forty-seven pts were enrolled and received epirubicin 60 mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles before surgery. Within 4 weeks after surgery, 4 additional cycles of ET were given to the pts who responded to ET. Results: Forty-five pts were evaluable for safety and clinical response. The median age was 47 (range, 29–75). The tumor size was T2 in 44% of the pts, T3 in 36%, and T4 in 20%. ER and PgR were both positive in 40% of pts, while both negative in 31%. HER2 was positive in 33% of pts. Four cycles of ET at full dose were given to 96% of pts prior to surgery. The clinical response was 73% including 7% CR (95% CI 58–85%); the BCS rate was 36%. Central pathologic review was performed in 37 pts showing disappearance of all tumor cells (grade 1) in 1 patient (3%) and 2 pts (5%) achieved a grade 2 response (in situ carcinoma in the operated breast) by Chevallier’s criteria. Grade 3–4 toxicities included neutropenia (71%), leukocytopenia (69%), febrile neutropenia (18%) and anorexia (9%). Twenty-four of 33 pts who responded to ET received additional ET after surgery. Conclusions: ET showed a high clinical response in previously untreated EBC with acceptable toxicity. In order to improve pathological CRs further, the doses and treatment schedule of this regimen needs to be improved. Currently, we are following the pts to assess differences in survival between pts with or without additional adjuvant ET. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.