[Purpose] To confirm the necessity of considering students' Grit scores when determining their stages of vocational identity development. [Subjects and Methods] A questionnaire survey was conducted, involving 85 students of the Department of Physical Therapy of a health care college, to examine their scores from a vocational identity scale for health care students (vocational identity scale) and the Japanese-version Short Grit Scale (Grit-S), in addition to basic attributes. The relationship between scores from the 2 scales and their subscales was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.[Results] There was a significant positive correlation between the students' scores from the Grit-S and vocational identity scale, including their subscales.
[Purpose] With the aim of obtaining basic data as a support measure to promote inexperienced physical therapists' career development, this study examined the status of their career adaptability, as well as the relationship between such adaptability and mentors. [Subjects and Methods] A questionnaire survey was conducted, involving 149 physical therapists with clinical experience of 1 to 5 years, to examine their basic attributes, scores from a career adaptability scale, and the presence/absence of mentors for them.[Results] On comparing therapists with and without mentors, the former showed significantly higher career adaptability scores related to interest, control, and self-confidence.[Conclusion] The results suggest the possibility of mentors influencing physical therapists' career development.
[Purpose] To investigate the influence of the degree of self-determination on exam results and willingness to learn in the motivation of students aiming to become physical therapists. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 30 healthy adults, average age: 19.1 ± 2.5 years. Degree of self-determination in aiming to become a physical therapist and values of aspects of willingness to learn were assessed using a paper questionnaire. [Results] Significant positive correlations were found between intrinsic motivation and interest, personal attainment values, and exam results, as well as between identification regulation and public attainment values. Significant negative correlations were found between extrinsic regulation and exam results, as well as helplessness and interest, private attainment values and exam results.[Conclusion] The results indicated the possibility that the degree of selfdetermination among those aiming to become physical therapists influences their willingness to learn and their exam results.
[Purpose] To examine the effects of providing information regarding low back pain on care workers' catastrophic thoughts on such pain and recognition of its prognosis, as well as their relationships with the presence/ absence and level of the pain. [Subjects and Methods] A lecture-based workshop was held for 29 care workers to provide them with information regarding low back pain. The participants were divided into: low back pain and nonlow back pain groups, to compare their scores before and after the intervention.[Results] Scores representing the recognition of low back pain prognosis significantly increased after the intervention in both the low back pain and non-low back pain groups. Those representing catastrophic thoughts markedly improved in the latter, while there were no significant differences in the scores in the former.[Conclusion] The provision of related information may improve catastrophic thoughts on low back pain and recognition of its prognosis among care workers with it. It may also improve the recognition among those without such pain. Key words: low back pain, catastrophic thoughts, the recognition of low back pain prognosis
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.