BackgroundCharacterising the psychiatric sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can inform the development of long-term treatment strategies. However, few studies have examined these sequelae at different time points after COVID-19 infection.AimsThe study aimed to investigate the incidences and risks of acute and delayed psychiatric sequelae in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Japan.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted using a database comprising healthcare claims data from public health insurance enrollees residing in a Japanese city. We analysed a primary cohort comprising patients hospitalised with COVID-19 between March 2020 and July 2021 and two control cohorts comprising patients hospitalised with influenza or other respiratory tract infections (RTI) during the same period. We calculated the incidences of acute (1–3 months after infection) and delayed (4–6 months after infection) psychiatric sequelae. These sequelae were identified using diagnosis codes and categorised as mood/anxiety/psychotic disorder, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder or insomnia. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of psychiatric sequelae occurrence after COVID-19 infection compared with influenza and other RTI.ResultsThe study population with acute psychiatric sequela consisted of 662 patients with COVID-19, 644 patients with influenza, and 7369 patients with RTI who could be followed for 3 months; the study population with delayed psychiatric sequelae consisted of 371 patients with COVID-19, 546 patients with influenza, and 5397 patients with RTI who could be followed for 6 months. In the analysis of acute psychiatric sequelae, COVID-19 had significantly higher odds of mood/anxiety/psychotic disorder (OR: 1.39, p=0.026), psychotic disorder (OR: 2.13, p<0.001), and insomnia (OR: 2.59, p<0.001) than influenza, and significantly higher odds of insomnia (OR: 1.44, p=0.002) and significantly lower odds of anxiety disorder (OR: 0.56, p<0.001) than other RTI. In the analysis of delayed psychiatric sequelae, COVID-19 had significantly higher odds of psychotic disorder (OR: 2.25, p=0.007) than influenza, but significantly lower odds of anxiety disorder (OR: 0.55, p=0.011) than other RTI.ConclusionsCOVID-19 was generally associated with an increased risk of psychiatric sequelae occurring within 3 months after infection, but had a lower risk of new psychiatric sequelae developing 4–6 months after infection.
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can increase both medical care and long-term care (LTC) costs, but the latter are frequently neglected in estimates of AD’s economic burden. Objective: To elucidate the economic burden of new AD cases in Japan by estimating patient-level medical care and LTC expenditures over 3 years using a longitudinal database. Methods: The study was performed using monthly claims data from residents of 6 municipalities in Japan. We identified patients with new AD diagnoses between April 2015 and March 2016 with 3 years of follow-up data. Medical care and LTC expenditures were estimated from 1 year before onset until 3 years after onset. To quantify the additional AD-attributable expenditures, AD patients were matched with non-AD controls using propensity scores, and their differences in expenditures were calculated. Results: After propensity score matching, the AD group and non-AD group each comprised 1748 individuals for analysis (AD group: mean age±standard deviation, 81.9±7.6 years; women, 66.0%). The total additional expenditures peaked at $1398 in the first month, followed by $1192 and $1031 in the second and third months, respectively. The additional LTC expenditures increased substantially 3 months after AD onset ($227), and gradually increased thereafter. These additional LTC expenditures eventually exceeded the additional medical care expenditures in the second year after AD onset. Conclusion: Although total AD-attributable expenditures peaked just after disease onset, the impact of LTC on these expenditures rose over time. Failure to include LTC expenditures would severely underestimate the economic burden of AD.
Background
An increased risk of fracture has been reported in older adults taking hypnotics. However, few studies have reported the comparative safety of hypnotics with different mechanisms of action. We examined the risk of fracture in older adults initiating suvorexant compared to those initiating Z‐drugs.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a claims database within a longevity improvement and fair evidence (LIFE) study in Japan (1.5 million beneficiaries). People aged ≥65 years were included in this study. Exposure was defined as the initiation of either suvorexant or Z‐drugs (eszopiclone, zolpidem, or zopiclone). The evaluated outcomes were hip fracture and all‐cause fracture requiring hospitalization. We used inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding and followed the incidence of the outcome for three different periods: 30, 90, and 365 days. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the weighted population to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Sensitivity analyses were performed with narrowed outcome definitions and inverse probability of censoring weights.
Results
We identified 16,148 suvorexant new users and 54,327 Z‐drugs new users. During the 30‐day follow‐up, 21 (16.6 events per 1000 person‐years) and 53 hip fractures (12.2 events per 1000 person‐years) were identified among suvorexant and Z‐drugs new users, respectively (HR: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58–1.76). The analysis for all‐cause fracture showed an HR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78–1.36). Extended follow‐up (90 and 365 days) showed similar results for both outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results except for an increased risk of all‐cause fracture requiring surgery (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.87–2.29) during the 30‐day follow‐up.
Conclusions
This is the first study to show that suvorexant has a generally comparable risk of fracture as compared to Z‐drugs. Further research is needed to investigate the potential short‐term increased risk of all‐cause fracture requiring surgery among suvorexant initiators.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.