No abstract

The Review summarizes much of particle physics and cosmology. Using data from previous editions, plus 3,324 new measurements from 878 papers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons and the recently discovered Higgs boson, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons. We summarize searches for hypothetical particles such as supersymmetric particles, heavy bosons, axions, dark photons, etc. Particle properties and search limits are listed in Summary Tables. We give numerous tables, figures, formulae, and reviews of topics such as Higgs Boson Physics, Supersymmetry, Grand Unified Theories, Neutrino Mixing, Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Cosmology, Particle Detectors, Colliders, Probability and Statistics. Among the 120 reviews are many that are new or heavily revised, including a new review on High Energy Soft QCD and Diffraction and one on the Determination of CKM Angles from B Hadrons. The Review is divided into two volumes. Volume 1 includes the Summary Tables and 98 review articles. Volume 2 consists of the Particle Listings and contains also 22 reviews that address specific aspects of the data presented in the Listings. The complete Review (both volumes) is published online on the website of the Particle Data Group (pdg.lbl.gov) and in a journal. Volume 1 is available in print as the PDG Book. A Particle Physics Booklet with the Summary Tables and essential tables, figures, and equations from selected review articles is available in print and as a web version optimized for use on phones as well as an Android app.

The Review summarizes much of particle physics and cosmology. Using data from previous editions, plus 2,143 new measurements from 709 papers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons and the recently discovered Higgs boson, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons. We summarize searches for hypothetical particles such as supersymmetric particles, heavy bosons, axions, dark photons, etc. Particle properties and search limits are listed in Summary Tables. We give numerous tables, figures, formulae, and reviews of topics such as Higgs Boson Physics, Supersymmetry, Grand Unified Theories, Neutrino Mixing, Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Cosmology, Particle Detectors, Colliders, Probability and Statistics. Among the 120 reviews are many that are new or heavily revised, including a new review on Machine Learning, and one on Spectroscopy of Light Meson Resonances. The Review is divided into two volumes. Volume 1 includes the Summary Tables and 97 review articles. Volume 2 consists of the Particle Listings and contains also 23 reviews that address specific aspects of the data presented in the Listings. The complete Review (both volumes) is published online on the website of the Particle Data Group (pdg.lbl.gov) and in a journal. Volume 1 is available in print as the PDG Book. A Particle Physics Booklet with the Summary Tables and essential tables, figures, and equations from selected review articles is available in print, as a web version optimized for use on phones, and as an Android app.

DECi-hertz Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (DECIGO) is the future Japanese space gravitational wave antenna. DECIGO is expected to open a new window of observation for gravitational wave astronomy especially between 0.1 Hz and 10 Hz, revealing various mysteries of the universe such as dark energy, formation mechanism of supermassive black holes, and inflation of the universe. The pre-conceptual design of DECIGO consists of three drag-free spacecraft, whose relative displacements are measured by a differential Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometer. We plan to launch two missions, DECIGO pathfinder and pre-DECIGO first and finally DECIGO in 2024.

We investigate the cosmological moduli problem by studying a modulus decay in detail and find that the branching ratio of the gravitino production is generically of O(0.01 − 1), which causes another cosmological disaster. Consequently, the cosmological moduli problem cannot be solved simply by making the modulus mass heavier than 100 TeV. We also illustrate our results by explicitly calculating the branching ratio into the gravitinos in the mixed modulus-anomaly/KKLT-and racetrack-type models.The cosmological moduli problem [1] is one of the most challenging puzzles in particle physics and cosmology. In this letter, we show that the problem is even more difficult than usually thought.In supergravity/superstring theories, generically there exist moduli fields which have flat potentials and obtain masses from supersymmetry (SUSY) breaking and nonperturbative effects. During an inflationary period, a modulus field X is likely to develop a large expectation value. After the end of the inflation, it starts a coherent oscillation and soon dominates the energy density of the universe. Due to the interaction suppressed by the Planck scale M P = 2.4 × 10 18 GeV, the decay rate of the modulus X is extremely small:which leads to an onset of a radiation-dominated universe with a very low temperature:Here, c is an order one coefficient and g * is the effective number of massless degrees of freedom. This is cosmologically unacceptable because a successful big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) requires that the (last) radiationdominated universe starts with temperature higher thanAs is clear from Eq. (2), a simple solution would be to assume that the modulus X is ultra heavy a :Actually, there have been proposed scenarios with such a large modulus mass (cf. [5,6,7,8,9]). However, there exists yet another serious cosmological obstacle even for heavy moduli scenarios. The new problem is caused by the gravitino which is produced by the modulus decay. Indeed, as we will show, the branching a See Refs. [3,4] for other solutions. ratio of the modulus decay into the gravitino is generically quite largewhich causes serious problems after the modulus decay. We call this problem the moduli-induced gravitino problem.The gravitino production via modulus decay and its cosmological implications have been previously discussed in Refs. [10,11], taking Br(X → gravitino) ≪ 1. The main purpose of this letter is to show that Eq. (4) holds in a generic setup, and to emphasize how disastrous its consequences are. We also exemplify explicit results in the mixed modulus-anomaly/KKLT mediation [6,7] and in the racetrack [8] setups.Let us first estimate the branching ratio of a modulus decay into gravitino(s). We consider a heavy modulus scenario, m X > ∼ 100 TeV [cf. Eq. (3)]. On the other hand, the gravitino is likely to be (much) lighter than 100 TeV, because too large gravitino mass requires a finetuning in the Higgs sector due to the anomaly-mediated effects. Thus, we assume m X ≫ m 3/2 hereafter. After choosing the unitary gauge in the Einstein frame, w...