SummaryIn this study we compared the performance of the single use flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA Flexible™) with the original reusable LMA Flexible™ in paediatric dento‐alveolar day‐case surgery. The aim of the study was to determine whether these two supraglottic airway devices were clinically equivalent when used for simple dental extractions in children under general anaesthesia. This randomised comparative trial in 100 healthy children used first attempt airway insertion success as its primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included the adequacy of ventilation, incidence of airway obstruction and the requirement for device manipulation and the incidence of adverse airway outcomes during recovery from anaesthesia. No difference was found between the devices in first attempt insertion success rate (94% with reusable LMA Flexible and 90% with single use LMA Flexible, p = 0.358), and ease of insertion was also similar (p = 0.5). Both devices performed equally well during surgery, with no significant differences in episodes of intra‐operative airway compromise (p = 0.387), and both the single use and reusable LMA Flexible displayed excellent recovery characteristics, with no occurrences of emergence airway obstruction. No blood was discovered within the inner LMA tube shaft in either device, implying that both protected against tracheobronchial soiling. We conclude therefore that the single use LMA Flexible is an acceptable alternative to the reusable LMA Flexible.

No abstract

No abstract

Topicalisation of the airway by various techniques has routinely been recommended for awake fibre-optic bronchoscopy in cases of difficult airway. However, topicalisation by itself can cause airway obstruction by decreasing the tone of the laryngeal muscles and causing a dynamic air inflow obstruction. Two cases of difficult airway are illustrated where anaesthetising upper airway with nebulisation with 4% lignocaine (Xylocaine™) or 2% lignocaine (Xylocaine™) jelly resulted in stridor and upper airway obstruction. This is the first reported case of airway obstruction after lignocaine (Xylocaine™) jelly. We would like to highlight that topicalisation of airway, once thought as a relatively safe technique, can cause airway collapse if not detected and anticipated at the earliest. Pre-operative spirometry and airway ultrasonography can be useful in detecting the patients at risk of developing airway obstruction. Using a nasopharyngeal airway during topicalisation can serve as a valuable device in preventing total airway obstruction in susceptible patients.